linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@profusion.mobi>
To: Yuri Ershov <ext-yuri.ershov@nokia.com>
Cc: marcel@holtmann.org, davem@davemloft.net, jprvita@profusion.mobi,
	ville.tervo@nokia.com, andrei.emeltchenko@nokia.com,
	"linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] bluetooth: Fix NULL pointer dereference issue
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:50:38 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101207155037.GA2944@vigoh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CFE32A0.6090601@nokia.com>

Hi Yuri,

* Yuri Ershov <ext-yuri.ershov@nokia.com> [2010-12-07 16:12:00 +0300]:

> Hello Gustavo,
> 
> ext Gustavo F. Padovan wrote:
> > Hi Yuri,
> >
> > * Yuri Ershov <ext-yuri.ershov@nokia.com> [2010-11-25 12:55:33 +0300]:
> >
> >   
> >> This patch is an addition to my previous patch for this issue.
> >> The problem is in resynchronization between two loops:
> >> 1. Main controlling loop (l2cap_connect_req, l2cap_config_req,
> >> l2cap_config_rsp, l2cap_disconnect_req, etc.)
> >> 2. Loop waiting of BT_CONNECTED state of socket (l2cap_sock_accept,
> >> bt_accept_dequeue, etc.).
> >> In case of fast sequence of connect/disconnect operations the loop #1
> >> makes several cycles, while the loop #2 only has time to make one
> >> cycle and it results crash.
> >> The aim of the patch is to skeep handling of sockets queued for
> >> deletion.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yuri Ershov <ext-yuri.ershov@nokia.com>
> >> ---
> >>  net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c |    2 ++
> >>  net/bluetooth/l2cap.c        |    6 ++++--
> >>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c b/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
> >> index c4cf3f5..f9389da 100644
> >> --- a/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
> >> +++ b/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c
> >> @@ -200,6 +200,8 @@ struct sock *bt_accept_dequeue(struct sock *parent, struct socket *newsock)
> >>  	BT_DBG("parent %p", parent);
> >>  
> >>  	list_for_each_safe(p, n, &bt_sk(parent)->accept_q) {
> >> +		if (n == p)
> >> +			break;
> >>     
> >
> > So in which situations (n == p), or (p == p->next)? That should happen only
> > when p is the only element in the list, then p == head, right?
> >   
> The (n == p) is in situation, when sk is unlinked by task responsible 
> for handling connect/disconnect requests while the "bt_accept_dequeue". 
> This condition is indirect checking of sk validity.

Why not using a list lock here instead? Fits a way better.

-- 
Gustavo F. Padovan
http://profusion.mobi

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-07 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-25  9:55 [PATCH 1/1] bluetooth: Fix NULL pointer dereference issue Yuri Ershov
2010-11-25 18:16 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-11-26  8:50   ` Yuri Ershov
2010-12-06 21:15 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
     [not found]   ` <4CFE32A0.6090601@nokia.com>
2010-12-07 15:50     ` Gustavo F. Padovan [this message]
2010-12-08 10:52       ` Yuri Ershov
2010-12-10  7:17         ` Ville Tervo
     [not found]           ` <4D01EBD7.1060804@nokia.com>
2010-12-30 14:45             ` Yuri Ershov
2011-01-13 14:37           ` Andrei Emeltchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101207155037.GA2944@vigoh \
    --to=padovan@profusion.mobi \
    --cc=andrei.emeltchenko@nokia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ext-yuri.ershov@nokia.com \
    --cc=jprvita@profusion.mobi \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=ville.tervo@nokia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).