From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
To: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: second scan timing out, bisected to 314b2381a79c6bfe3ddc4ba3806ecb6aec27a3db
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:52:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108301552.19010.oliver@neukum.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110830084322.GA15992@dell.ger.corp.intel.com>
Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 10:45:05 schrieb Johan Hedberg:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> I think this is a real issue, but it only happens with the HCIINQUIRY
> ioctl which bluetoothd doesn't use (but hcitool does). I think the
> problems is with the following type of additions in the patch:
>
> + if (test_bit(HCI_MGMT, &hdev->flags) &&
> + test_and_clear_bit(HCI_INQUIRY, &hdev->flags))
> + mgmt_discovering(hdev->id, 0);
>
> Because of the ordering of the if-statement the HCI_INQUIRY flags
> doesn't get cleared if HCI_MGMT is not set and so the HCIINQUIRY ioctl
> doesn't trigger inquiry even though it should (see hci_inq_req in
> net/bluetooth/hci_core.c). Can you try to flip the ordering of the
> test_bit and test_and_clear_bit calls in all relevant if-statements in
> the patch and see if it resolves your issue?
Hi,
this patch makes it work again.
Regards
Oliver
>From 06dedee9fb972748bb9240a498c954089ed1b41e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:33:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] BT:fix timeout on scanning for the second time
The checks for HCI_INQUIRY and HCI_MGMT were in the wrong order,
so that second scans always failed.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>
---
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 17 ++++++++---------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
index a40170e..7ef4eb4 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
@@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ static void hci_cc_inquiry_cancel(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (status)
return;
- if (test_bit(HCI_MGMT, &hdev->flags) &&
- test_and_clear_bit(HCI_INQUIRY, &hdev->flags))
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(HCI_INQUIRY, &hdev->flags) &&
+ test_bit(HCI_MGMT, &hdev->flags))
mgmt_discovering(hdev->id, 0);
hci_req_complete(hdev, HCI_OP_INQUIRY_CANCEL, status);
@@ -76,8 +76,8 @@ static void hci_cc_exit_periodic_inq(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (status)
return;
- if (test_bit(HCI_MGMT, &hdev->flags) &&
- test_and_clear_bit(HCI_INQUIRY, &hdev->flags))
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(HCI_INQUIRY, &hdev->flags) &&
+ test_bit(HCI_MGMT, &hdev->flags))
mgmt_discovering(hdev->id, 0);
hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
@@ -959,9 +959,8 @@ static inline void hci_cs_inquiry(struct hci_dev *hdev, __u8 status)
return;
}
- if (test_bit(HCI_MGMT, &hdev->flags) &&
- !test_and_set_bit(HCI_INQUIRY,
- &hdev->flags))
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(HCI_INQUIRY, &hdev->flags) &&
+ test_bit(HCI_MGMT, &hdev->flags))
mgmt_discovering(hdev->id, 1);
}
@@ -1340,8 +1339,8 @@ static inline void hci_inquiry_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff
BT_DBG("%s status %d", hdev->name, status);
- if (test_bit(HCI_MGMT, &hdev->flags) &&
- test_and_clear_bit(HCI_INQUIRY, &hdev->flags))
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(HCI_INQUIRY, &hdev->flags) &&
+ test_bit(HCI_MGMT, &hdev->flags))
mgmt_discovering(hdev->id, 0);
hci_req_complete(hdev, HCI_OP_INQUIRY, status);
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-30 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-30 8:05 second scan timing out, bisected to 314b2381a79c6bfe3ddc4ba3806ecb6aec27a3db Oliver Neukum
2011-08-30 8:45 ` Johan Hedberg
2011-08-30 13:52 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2011-08-30 14:53 ` Andre Guedes
2011-08-31 14:16 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-08-31 14:46 ` Andre Guedes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201108301552.19010.oliver@neukum.org \
--to=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).