From: Emeltchenko Andrei <Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com>
To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 11/16] Bluetooth: EWS: handling different Control fields
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:56:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111014105600.GA32656@aemeltch-MOBL1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111013194925.GB20892@joana>
Hi Gustavo,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 04:49:25PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> * Emeltchenko Andrei <Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com> [2011-10-11 13:37:51 +0300]:
>
> > From: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@intel.com>
> >
> > There are three different Control Field formats: the Standard Control
> > Field, the Enhanced Control Field, and the Extended Control Field.
> > Patch adds function to handle all those fields seamlessly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@intel.com>
> > ---
> > include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++
> > net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h b/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
> > index 67a2fdb..3a5f4c0 100644
> > --- a/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
> > +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
> > @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
> > #ifndef __L2CAP_H
> > #define __L2CAP_H
> >
> > +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
> > +
> > /* L2CAP defaults */
> > #define L2CAP_DEFAULT_MTU 672
> > #define L2CAP_DEFAULT_MIN_MTU 48
> > @@ -643,6 +645,47 @@ static inline bool __is_ctrl_poll(struct l2cap_chan *chan, __u32 ctrl)
> > else
> > return ctrl & L2CAP_CTRL_POLL;
> > }
> > +
> > +static inline __u32 __get_control(struct l2cap_chan *chan, void *p)
> > +{
> > + if (test_bit(FLAG_EXT_CTRL, &chan->flags))
> > + return get_unaligned_le32(p);
> > + else
> > + return get_unaligned_le16(p);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline __u32 __get_control_pull(struct l2cap_chan *chan,
> > + struct sk_buff *skb, void *p)
> > +{
> > + __u32 ctrl;
> > +
> > + if (test_bit(FLAG_EXT_CTRL, &chan->flags)) {
> > + ctrl = get_unaligned_le32(p);
> > + skb_pull(skb, 4);
> > + } else {
> > + ctrl = get_unaligned_le16(p);
> > + skb_pull(skb, 2);
> > + }
>
>
> I prefer not hide the skb_pull inside another function.
OK, I will change it to something like:
<------8<----------------------------------------------------------------
| @@ -4005,7 +4009,8 @@ static int l2cap_ertm_data_rcv(struct sock *sk,
| struct sk_buff *skb)
| u16 req_seq;
| int len, next_tx_seq_offset, req_seq_offset;
|
| - control = __get_control_pull(chan, skb, skb->data);
| + control = __get_control(chan, skb->data);
| + skb_pull(skb, __get_ctrl_size(chan));
| len = skb->len;
|
| /*
|
<------8<----------------------------------------------------------------
> > +
> > + return ctrl;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void __put_control(struct l2cap_chan *chan, __u32 control, void *p)
> > +{
> > + if (test_bit(FLAG_EXT_CTRL, &chan->flags))
> > + return put_unaligned_le32(control, p);
> > + else
> > + return put_unaligned_le16(control, p);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void __put_control_put(struct l2cap_chan *chan, __u32 control, void *p)
> > +{
> > + if (test_bit(FLAG_EXT_CTRL, &chan->flags))
> > + return put_unaligned_le32(control, skb_put(p, 4));
> > + else
> > + return put_unaligned_le16(control, skb_put(p, 2));
> > +}
>
>
> get ride of this, you still can do __put_control(chan, control,
> skb_put())
the second argument in skb_put changes so I cannot use proposed way.
what about change to code below:
<------8<--------------------------------------------------------
| @@ -1586,6 +1588,7 @@ static struct sk_buff
| *l2cap_create_iframe_pdu(struct l2cap_chan *chan,
| struct sk_buff *skb;
| int err, count, hlen;
| struct l2cap_hdr *lh;
| + unsigned char *data;
|
| BT_DBG("sk %p len %d", sk, (int)len);
|
| @@ -1614,7 +1617,8 @@ static struct sk_buff
| *l2cap_create_iframe_pdu(struct l2cap_chan *chan,
| lh->cid = cpu_to_le16(chan->dcid);
| lh->len = cpu_to_le16(len + (hlen - L2CAP_HDR_SIZE));
|
| - __put_control_put(chan, control, skb);
| + data = skb_put(skb, __get_ctrl_size(chan));
| + __put_control(chan, control, data);
|
| if (sdulen)
| put_unaligned_le16(sdulen, skb_put(skb,
| L2CAP_SDULEN_SIZE));
|
<------8<--------------------------------------------------------
Best regards
Andrei Emeltchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-14 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-11 10:37 [PATCHv3 00/16] EWS: extended window size and extended control field support Emeltchenko Andrei
2011-10-11 10:37 ` [PATCHv3 01/16] Bluetooth: clean up spaces in L2CAP header Emeltchenko Andrei
2011-10-11 10:37 ` [PATCHv3 02/16] Bluetooth: EWS: extended window size option support Emeltchenko Andrei
2011-10-11 10:37 ` [PATCHv3 03/16] Bluetooth: EWS: adds ext control field bit mask Emeltchenko Andrei
2011-10-11 10:37 ` [PATCHv3 04/16] Bluetooth: EWS: rewrite handling Supervisory (S) bits Emeltchenko Andrei
2011-10-11 10:37 ` [PATCHv3 05/16] Bluetooth: EWS: rewrite handling SAR bits Emeltchenko Andrei
2011-10-11 10:37 ` [PATCHv3 06/16] Bluetooth: EWS: rewrite reqseq calculation Emeltchenko Andrei
2011-10-11 10:37 ` [PATCHv3 07/16] Bluetooth: EWS: rewrite L2CAP ERTM txseq calculation Emeltchenko Andrei
2011-10-11 10:37 ` [PATCHv3 08/16] Bluetooth: EWS: rewrite check frame type function Emeltchenko Andrei
2011-10-11 10:37 ` [PATCHv3 09/16] Bluetooth: EWS: rewrite handling FINAL (F) bit Emeltchenko Andrei
2011-10-11 10:37 ` [PATCHv3 10/16] Bluetooth: EWS: rewrite handling POLL (P) bit Emeltchenko Andrei
2011-10-13 19:47 ` Gustavo Padovan
2011-10-11 10:37 ` [PATCHv3 11/16] Bluetooth: EWS: handling different Control fields Emeltchenko Andrei
2011-10-13 19:49 ` Gustavo Padovan
2011-10-14 10:56 ` Emeltchenko Andrei [this message]
2011-10-14 18:09 ` Gustavo Padovan
2011-10-14 18:19 ` Gustavo Padovan
2011-10-11 10:37 ` [PATCHv3 12/16] Bluetooth: EWS: recalculate L2CAP header size Emeltchenko Andrei
2011-10-13 19:54 ` Gustavo Padovan
2011-10-11 10:37 ` [PATCHv3 13/16] Bluetooth: EWS: support extended seq numbers Emeltchenko Andrei
2011-10-11 10:37 ` [PATCHv3 14/16] Bluetooth: EWS: define L2CAP header sizes Emeltchenko Andrei
2011-10-13 19:55 ` Gustavo Padovan
2011-10-14 11:15 ` Emeltchenko Andrei
2011-10-11 10:37 ` [PATCHv3 15/16] Bluetooth: EWS: remove magic numbers in l2cap Emeltchenko Andrei
2011-10-11 10:37 ` [PATCHv3 16/16] Bluetooth: EWS: fix max_pdu calculation Emeltchenko Andrei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111014105600.GA32656@aemeltch-MOBL1 \
--to=andrei.emeltchenko.news@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox