From: Gustavo Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: Mat Martineau <mathewm@codeaurora.org>,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, pkrystad@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] Bluetooth: Prevent uninitialized data access in L2CAP configuration
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 22:22:35 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111219002234.GM2621@joana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323417975.1965.51.camel@aeonflux>
Hi Mat,
* Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> [2011-12-09 10:06:15 +0200]:
> Hi Mat,
>
> > When configuring an ERTM or streaming mode connection, remote devices
> > are expected to send an RFC option in a successful config response. A
> > misbehaving remote device might not send an RFC option, and the L2CAP
> > code should not access uninitialized data in this case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathewm@codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> > net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> > 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> > index 5ea94a1..45dd423 100644
> > --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> > +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> > @@ -2152,7 +2152,7 @@ static int l2cap_parse_conf_rsp(struct l2cap_chan *chan, void *rsp, int len, voi
> > void *ptr = req->data;
> > int type, olen;
> > unsigned long val;
> > - struct l2cap_conf_rfc rfc;
> > + struct l2cap_conf_rfc rfc = { .mode = L2CAP_MODE_BASIC };
> >
> > BT_DBG("chan %p, rsp %p, len %d, req %p", chan, rsp, len, data);
> >
> > @@ -2271,6 +2271,15 @@ static void l2cap_conf_rfc_get(struct l2cap_chan *chan, void *rsp, int len)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + /* Use sane default values in case a misbehaving remote device
> > + * did not send an RFC option.
> > + */
> > + BT_ERR("Expected RFC option was not found, using defaults");
> > + rfc.mode = chan->mode;
> > + rfc.retrans_timeout = cpu_to_le16(L2CAP_DEFAULT_RETRANS_TO);
> > + rfc.monitor_timeout = cpu_to_le16(L2CAP_DEFAULT_MONITOR_TO);
> > + rfc.max_pdu_size = cpu_to_le16(chan->imtu);
>
> I would actually put the BT_ERR afterwards the assignments separated
> with an extra empty line, but that is just to make it a bit easier on
> the eyes.
I applied this one with this change.
Gustavo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-19 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-09 1:23 [PATCHv2] Bluetooth: Prevent uninitialized data access in L2CAP configuration Mat Martineau
2011-12-09 8:06 ` Marcel Holtmann
2011-12-19 0:22 ` Gustavo Padovan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111219002234.GM2621@joana \
--to=padovan@profusion.mobi \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=mathewm@codeaurora.org \
--cc=pkrystad@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox