From: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko.news@gmail.com>
To: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@profusion.mobi>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 10/22] Bluetooth: convert chan_lock to mutex
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:58:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111219095837.GB3982@aemeltch-MOBL1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1324157382-1815-11-git-send-email-padovan@profusion.mobi>
Hi Gustavo,
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 07:29:30PM -0200, Gustavo F. Padovan wrote:
> From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@profusion.mobi>
>
> spin lock doesn't fit ok anymore on the new code based on workqueues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
> ---
> include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h | 2 +-
> net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h b/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
> index 03be911..a175091 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
> @@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ struct l2cap_conn {
> struct smp_chan *smp_chan;
>
> struct list_head chan_l;
> - rwlock_t chan_lock;
> + struct mutex chan_lock;
> };
>
> #define L2CAP_INFO_CL_MTU_REQ_SENT 0x01
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> index 31c94fd..5c5948f 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> @@ -115,11 +115,11 @@ static struct l2cap_chan *l2cap_get_chan_by_scid(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u16 ci
> {
> struct l2cap_chan *c;
>
> - read_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
> c = __l2cap_get_chan_by_scid(conn, cid);
> if (c)
> lock_sock(c->sk);
> - read_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
> return c;
> }
>
> @@ -138,11 +138,11 @@ static inline struct l2cap_chan *l2cap_get_chan_by_ident(struct l2cap_conn *conn
> {
> struct l2cap_chan *c;
>
> - read_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
> c = __l2cap_get_chan_by_ident(conn, ident);
> if (c)
> lock_sock(c->sk);
> - read_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
> return c;
> }
>
> @@ -381,9 +381,9 @@ static void l2cap_chan_del(struct l2cap_chan *chan, int err)
>
> if (conn) {
> /* Delete from channel list */
> - write_lock_bh(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
> list_del(&chan->list);
> - write_unlock_bh(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
> chan_put(chan);
>
> chan->conn = NULL;
> @@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ static void l2cap_conn_start(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
>
> BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
>
> - read_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(chan, tmp, &conn->chan_l, list) {
> struct sock *sk = chan->sk;
> @@ -780,9 +780,9 @@ static void l2cap_conn_start(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
> &chan->conf_state)) {
> /* l2cap_chan_close() calls list_del(chan)
> * so release the lock */
> - read_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
> l2cap_chan_close(chan, ECONNRESET);
> - read_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
> + utex_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
Something corrupted here?
Best regards
Andrei Emeltchenko
> bh_unlock_sock(sk);
> continue;
> }
> @@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ static void l2cap_conn_start(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
> bh_unlock_sock(sk);
> }
>
> - read_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
> }
>
> /* Find socket with cid and source bdaddr.
> @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static void l2cap_le_conn_ready(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
>
> sk = chan->sk;
>
> - write_lock_bh(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
>
> hci_conn_hold(conn->hcon);
>
> @@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ static void l2cap_le_conn_ready(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
> l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECTED);
> parent->sk_data_ready(parent, 0);
>
> - write_unlock_bh(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
>
> clean:
> release_sock(parent);
> @@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ static void l2cap_conn_ready(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
> if (conn->hcon->out && conn->hcon->type == LE_LINK)
> smp_conn_security(conn, conn->hcon->pending_sec_level);
>
> - read_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
>
> list_for_each_entry(chan, &conn->chan_l, list) {
> struct sock *sk = chan->sk;
> @@ -976,7 +976,7 @@ static void l2cap_conn_ready(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
> bh_unlock_sock(sk);
> }
>
> - read_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
> }
>
> /* Notify sockets that we cannot guaranty reliability anymore */
> @@ -986,7 +986,7 @@ static void l2cap_conn_unreliable(struct l2cap_conn *conn, int err)
>
> BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
>
> - read_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
>
> list_for_each_entry(chan, &conn->chan_l, list) {
> struct sock *sk = chan->sk;
> @@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ static void l2cap_conn_unreliable(struct l2cap_conn *conn, int err)
> sk->sk_err = err;
> }
>
> - read_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
> }
>
> static void l2cap_info_timeout(unsigned long arg)
> @@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ static struct l2cap_conn *l2cap_conn_add(struct hci_conn *hcon, u8 status)
> conn->feat_mask = 0;
>
> spin_lock_init(&conn->lock);
> - rwlock_init(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_init(&conn->chan_lock);
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&conn->chan_l);
>
> @@ -1104,9 +1104,9 @@ static struct l2cap_conn *l2cap_conn_add(struct hci_conn *hcon, u8 status)
>
> static inline void l2cap_chan_add(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct l2cap_chan *chan)
> {
> - write_lock_bh(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
> __l2cap_chan_add(conn, chan);
> - write_unlock_bh(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
> }
>
> /* ---- Socket interface ---- */
> @@ -1771,7 +1771,7 @@ static void l2cap_raw_recv(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
>
> BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
>
> - read_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
> list_for_each_entry(chan, &conn->chan_l, list) {
> struct sock *sk = chan->sk;
> if (chan->chan_type != L2CAP_CHAN_RAW)
> @@ -1787,7 +1787,7 @@ static void l2cap_raw_recv(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
> if (chan->ops->recv(chan->data, nskb))
> kfree_skb(nskb);
> }
> - read_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
> }
>
> /* ---- L2CAP signalling commands ---- */
> @@ -2587,11 +2587,11 @@ static inline int l2cap_connect_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct l2cap_cmd_hd
>
> sk = chan->sk;
>
> - write_lock_bh(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
>
> /* Check if we already have channel with that dcid */
> if (__l2cap_get_chan_by_dcid(conn, scid)) {
> - write_unlock_bh(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
> sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED);
> chan->ops->close(chan->data);
> goto response;
> @@ -2637,7 +2637,7 @@ static inline int l2cap_connect_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct l2cap_cmd_hd
> status = L2CAP_CS_NO_INFO;
> }
>
> - write_unlock_bh(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
>
> response:
> release_sock(parent);
> @@ -4474,7 +4474,7 @@ static int l2cap_security_cfm(struct hci_conn *hcon, u8 status, u8 encrypt)
> del_timer(&conn->security_timer);
> }
>
> - read_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
>
> list_for_each_entry(chan, &conn->chan_l, list) {
> struct sock *sk = chan->sk;
> @@ -4554,7 +4554,7 @@ static int l2cap_security_cfm(struct hci_conn *hcon, u8 status, u8 encrypt)
> bh_unlock_sock(sk);
> }
>
> - read_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 1.7.6.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-19 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-17 21:29 [RFC 00/22] Bluetooth: change tasklets to workqueue Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 01/22] Bluetooth: Process recv path in a workqueue instead of a tasklet Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 02/22] Bluetooth: Replace spin_lock by mutex in hci_dev Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 03/22] Bluetooth: Use delayed_work for connection timeout Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 04/22] Bluetooth: Use delayed work for advertisiment cache timeout Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 05/22] Bluetooth: hci_conn_auto_accept() doesn't need locking Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 06/22] Bluetooth: Move L2CAP timers to workqueue Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 07/22] Bluetooth: Don't use spin_lock socket lock anymore Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 08/22] Bluetooth: Remove sk_backlog usage from L2CAP Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 09/22] Bluetooth: move hci_task_lock to mutex Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 10/22] Bluetooth: convert chan_lock " Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 11/22] Bluetooth: Use RCU to manipulate chan_list Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 12/22] Bluetooth: convert conn hash to RCU Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 13/22] Bluetooth: Don't disable tasklets to call hdev->notify() Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 14/22] Bluetooth: Move command task to workqueue Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 15/22] Bluetooth: convert tx_task " Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 16/22] Bluetooth: convert info timer to delayed_work Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 17/22] Bluetooth: remove power_on work_struct Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 18/22] Bluetooth: invert locking order in connect path Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 19/22] Bluetooth: Change l2cap chan_list to use RCU Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 20/22] Bluetooth: move power_off to system workqueue Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 21/22] Bluetooth: Use new alloc_workqueue() Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 21:29 ` [RFC 22/22] Bluetooth: Remove work_add and work_del from hci_sysfs Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-12-17 22:15 ` [RFC 19/22] Bluetooth: Change l2cap chan_list to use RCU Marcel Holtmann
2011-12-19 10:42 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2011-12-19 13:53 ` Gustavo Padovan
2011-12-17 22:13 ` [RFC 17/22] Bluetooth: remove power_on work_struct Marcel Holtmann
2012-01-26 13:20 ` [RFC 11/22] Bluetooth: Use RCU to manipulate chan_list Andrei Emeltchenko
2011-12-19 9:58 ` Andrei Emeltchenko [this message]
2011-12-19 9:53 ` [RFC 07/22] Bluetooth: Don't use spin_lock socket lock anymore Andrei Emeltchenko
2011-12-19 11:05 ` [RFC 06/22] Bluetooth: Move L2CAP timers to workqueue Andrei Emeltchenko
2011-12-19 12:59 ` Ulisses Furquim
2011-12-17 21:34 ` [RFC 00/22] Bluetooth: change tasklets " Gustavo Padovan
2011-12-17 22:17 ` Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111219095837.GB3982@aemeltch-MOBL1 \
--to=andrei.emeltchenko.news@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=padovan@profusion.mobi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox