From: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Bluetooth: Fix l2cap conn failures for ssp devices
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:26:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120111112646.GB23277@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F0AA5A2.4070903@monom.org>
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> On 04.01.2012 11:22, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > On 09.08.2011 22:26, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >> Commit 330605423c fixed l2cap conn establishment for non-ssp remote
> >> devices by not setting HCI_CONN_ENCRYPT_PEND every time conn security
> >> is tested (which was always returning failure on any subsequent
> >> security checks).
> >>
> >> However, this broke l2cap conn establishment for ssp remote devices
> >> when an ACL link was already established at SDP-level security. This
> >> fix ensures that encryption must be pending whenever authentication
> >> is also pending.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
> >
> > git am complaines:
> >
> > Applying: Bluetooth: Fix l2cap conn failures for ssp devices
> > /home/wagi/src/bluetooth-next/.git/rebase-apply/patch:18: trailing whitespace.
> >
> > /home/wagi/src/bluetooth-next/.git/rebase-apply/patch:19: trailing whitespace.
> > /* encrypt must be pending if auth is also pending */
> > /home/wagi/src/bluetooth-next/.git/rebase-apply/patch:20: trailing whitespace.
> > set_bit(HCI_CONN_ENCRYPT_PEND, &conn->pend);
> > /home/wagi/src/bluetooth-next/.git/rebase-apply/patch:21: trailing whitespace.
> >
> >
> > But it fixes the problem I was debugging. From what I have
> > learned in the last two days I would say it is also the right fix :)
>
> Is there any chance to get this patch in? If it helps I could send a
> whitespace fixed version.
Feel free to send a whitespace-fixed version, but even then I only apply
patches with Marcel's ack on them. Btw, have you verified that this
doesn't break non-SSP cases? Is this how the code used to behave before
the regression?
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-11 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-09 20:26 [PATCH v3] Bluetooth: Fix l2cap conn failures for ssp devices Peter Hurley
2012-01-04 10:22 ` Daniel Wagner
2012-01-09 8:30 ` Daniel Wagner
2012-01-11 11:26 ` Johan Hedberg [this message]
2012-01-16 19:37 ` Peter Hurley
2012-01-17 8:27 ` Johan Hedberg
2012-01-17 12:34 ` Peter Hurley
2012-02-01 22:22 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2012-02-02 0:12 ` Marcel Holtmann
2012-02-02 0:26 ` Johan Hedberg
2012-02-02 9:36 ` Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120111112646.GB23277@x220 \
--to=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=wagi@monom.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).