From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
To: Mat Martineau <mathewm@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, marcel@holtmann.org,
pkrystad@codeaurora.org, ulisses@profusion.mobi,
andrei.emeltchenko.news@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Bluetooth: Fix a redundant and problematic incoming MTU check
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 17:37:51 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120504203751.GC11510@joana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335976922-19456-2-git-send-email-mathewm@codeaurora.org>
Hi Mat,
* Mat Martineau <mathewm@codeaurora.org> [2012-05-02 09:41:59 -0700]:
> The L2CAP MTU for incoming data is verified differently depending on
> the L2CAP mode, so the check is best performed in a mode-specific
> context. Checking the incoming MTU before HCI fragment reassembly is
> a layer violation and assumes all bytes after the standard L2CAP
> header are L2CAP data.
>
> This approach causes issues with unsegmented ERTM or streaming mode
> frames, where there are additional enhanced or extended headers before
> the data payload and possible FCS bytes after the data payload. A
> valid frame could be as many as 10 bytes larger than the MTU.
>
> Removing this code is the best fix, because the MTU is checked later
> on for all L2CAP data frames (connectionless, basic, ERTM, and
> streaming). This also gets rid of outdated locking (socket instead of
> l2cap_chan) and an extra lookup of the channel ID.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathewm@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 20 --------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
Patch has been applied to the bluetooth tree. Thanks.
Gustavo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-04 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-02 16:41 [PATCH 0/4] ERTM state machine changes, part 2 Mat Martineau
2012-05-02 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] Bluetooth: Fix a redundant and problematic incoming MTU check Mat Martineau
2012-05-04 18:55 ` Ulisses Furquim
2012-05-04 20:39 ` Gustavo Padovan
2012-05-04 20:37 ` Gustavo Padovan [this message]
2012-05-02 16:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] Bluetooth: Restore locking semantics when looking up L2CAP channels Mat Martineau
2012-05-04 18:58 ` Ulisses Furquim
2012-05-02 16:42 ` [PATCH 3/4] Bluetooth: Lock the L2CAP channel when sending Mat Martineau
2012-05-04 19:06 ` Ulisses Furquim
2012-05-04 21:54 ` Mat Martineau
2012-05-05 1:11 ` Ulisses Furquim
2012-05-02 16:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] Bluetooth: Refactor L2CAP ERTM and streaming transmit segmentation Mat Martineau
2012-05-04 19:12 ` Ulisses Furquim
2012-05-04 20:57 ` Gustavo Padovan
2012-05-14 9:52 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2012-05-14 15:47 ` Mat Martineau
2012-05-02 21:40 ` [PATCH 0/4] ERTM state machine changes, part 2 Mat Martineau
2012-05-04 19:10 ` Ulisses Furquim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120504203751.GC11510@joana \
--to=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=andrei.emeltchenko.news@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=mathewm@codeaurora.org \
--cc=pkrystad@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ulisses@profusion.mobi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).