Re: [RFC] Reorganizing the BlueZ source tree

Bastien Nocera
2012-06-06T15:56:46Z

On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 12:05 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Bastien,
>
> > > > The last profiles addition to BlueZ increased a lot the number of folders we
> > > > have in the root dir of the project and it looks like more profiles (and more
> > > > folders) are expected to come.
> > > >
> > > > I talked a bit with Johan about changing the hierarchy of the BlueZ tree and
> > > > the following proposal where 2 new folders are created, 'profiles' and 'libs'
> > > > and things are moved to them.
> > > >
> > > > compat -> /dev/null (will be removed on 5.0)
> > > > alert -> profiles
> > > > audio -> profiles
> > > > cups -> profiles
> > > > deviceinfo -> profiles
> > > > health -> profiles
> > > > input -> profiles
> > > > lib -> profiles
> > > > network -> profiles
> > > > proximity -> profiles
> > > > sap -> profiles
> > > > serial -> profiles
> > > > thermometer -> profiles
> > > > time -> profiles
> > > > btio -> libs
> > > > gdbus -> libs
> > > > sbc -> libs
> > > > emulator -> tools
> > > > mgmt -> tools
> > > > monitor -> tools
> > > > attrib
> > > > doc
> > > > plugins
> > > > scripts
> > > > src
> > > > test
> > > > tools
> > > > unit
> > >
> > > Sounds good, the only problem are gdbus and btio, if we merge obexd
> > > into BlueZ btio will no longer be shared but for gdbus we would have
> > > to align with other projects as well.
> >
> > While you're at it, change gdbus' name to something that doesn't clash
> > with the GIO GDBus.
>
> why would we? This code predates GIO GDBus.

Because people told you that your naming would clash once glib had an
implementation of D-Bus, which you just laughed away.