From: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>
To: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org>,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix checking the wrong flag when accepting a socket
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:15:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120605031501.GA31521@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120605030151.GA31260@x220>
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012, Johan Hedberg wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > * Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org> [2012-05-31 22:53:39 -0300]:
> >
> > > Most probably a typo, the check should have been for BT_SK_DEFER_SETUP
> > > instead of BT_DEFER_SETUP (which right now only represents a socket
> > > option).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org>
> > > ---
> > > net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Patch has been applied to bluetooth-next. thanks.
>
> This patch fixes accepting L2CAP and RFCOMM connections for sockets with
> defer setup enabled (i.e. pretty much *all* sockets we have). This is
> now broken in 3.5-rc1 so the patch should go with the highest priority
> to the upstream trees. Furthermore, you said you applied it to
> bluetooth-next but it's not there. What's going on?
Actually the patch is in bluetooth-next (I was checking the wrong tree),
sorry about the false alarm there. However the patch really needs to go
to bluetooth.git too and then onwards to the upstream trees.
Johan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-05 3:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-01 1:53 [PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix checking the wrong flag when accepting a socket Vinicius Costa Gomes
2012-06-01 7:12 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2012-06-01 23:00 ` Gustavo Padovan
2012-06-05 3:01 ` Johan Hedberg
2012-06-05 3:15 ` Johan Hedberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120605031501.GA31521@x220 \
--to=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).