From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
To: Szymon Janc <szymon.janc@tieto.com>,
"linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Bluetooth: Fix legacy pairing with some devices
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:56:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120704075641.GB21012@joana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120629105653.GA17737@x220>
Hi Szymon,
* Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com> [2012-06-29 13:56:53 +0300]:
> Hi Szymon & Gustavo,
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2012, Szymon Janc wrote:
> > > > Some devices e.g. SonyEricsson Xperia ray and arc S don't do SDP search
> > > > before pairing. No L2CAP is connected so default HCI_DISCONN_TIMEOUT
> > > > (2 seconds) timeout value is being used. This results in problems with
> > > > legacy pairing as remote user has only few seconds to enter PIN before
> > > > ACL is disconnected.
> > > >
> > > > Increase disconnect timeout to HCI_PAIRING_TIMEOUT if SSP is disabled
> > > > and no linkey exists.
> > >
> > > does this only happen with SSP disabled?
> >
> > Yes, I've seen this only with SSP disabled.
> > After name request remote devices ask user to enter PIN and before user is
> > able to do so (4 sec only) link is disconnected (cause we didn't get pin
> > request event yet).
> >
> > For SSP hci_conn_hold is called in hci_io_capa_request_evt so link is not
> > disconnected.
> >
> > >
> > > Also add the hcidump output to the commit message would be helpful.
> >
> > hcidump for ssp disabled [1] and ssp enabled [2] below.
> >
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Szymon Janc <szymon.janc@tieto.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 7 ++++++-
> > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> > > > index ac86b65..98e8020 100644
> > > > --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> > > > +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> > > > @@ -1762,7 +1762,12 @@ static void hci_conn_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > > > if (conn->type == ACL_LINK) {
> > > > conn->state = BT_CONFIG;
> > > > hci_conn_hold(conn);
> > > > - conn->disc_timeout = HCI_DISCONN_TIMEOUT;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!hci_conn_ssp_enabled(conn) &&
> > > > + !hci_find_link_key(hdev, &ev->bdaddr))
> >
> > I could add also checking if connection is incoming to narrow case a bit further...
> >
> > > > + conn->disc_timeout = HCI_PAIRING_TIMEOUT;
> > > > + else
> > > > + conn->disc_timeout = HCI_DISCONN_TIMEOUT;
> > >
> > > You are also changing the timeout for a SDP search, for example, to
> > > HCI_PAIRING_TIMEOUT and this is not good. I think we need to be smarter here,
> > > we can't change the behaviour of things like SDP search here.
> >
> > Maybe we could set timeout back to HCI_DICONN_TIMEOUT when l2cap is
> > connected (or disconnected)? That should cover SDP search case..
>
> What happened to getting this patch upstream? To me it looks like a
> definitely needed fix. After adding the fix to restore a sensible value
> for disc_timeout after an L2CAP connect request either way and adding a
> better explanation to the commit message (that we only get the PIN
> request after user has entered one on the remote side, including a
> hcidump of this) I think this should go upstream. If this had been
> processed in a timely manner it could have made it to 3.5 but now it
> seems too late for that (as it's not strictly speaking a regression from
> 3.4).
Could you re-do this patch as Johan says so we can try push it to 3.5?
Gustavo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-04 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-28 9:47 [PATCH 1/2] Bluetooth: Fix legacy pairing with some devices Szymon Janc
2012-05-28 9:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] Bluetooth: Remove unused HCI timeouts definitions Szymon Janc
2012-05-29 17:39 ` Gustavo Padovan
2012-05-29 17:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] Bluetooth: Fix legacy pairing with some devices Gustavo Padovan
2012-05-30 7:41 ` Szymon Janc
2012-06-29 10:56 ` Johan Hedberg
2012-07-04 7:56 ` Gustavo Padovan [this message]
2012-07-19 9:13 ` Szymon Janc
2012-07-19 9:34 ` Johan Hedberg
2012-07-19 10:17 ` Szymon Janc
2012-07-19 10:25 ` Johan Hedberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120704075641.GB21012@joana \
--to=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=szymon.janc@tieto.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox