public inbox for linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
To: Szymon Janc <szymon.janc@tieto.com>,
	"linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Bluetooth: Fix legacy pairing with some devices
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:56:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120704075641.GB21012@joana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120629105653.GA17737@x220>

Hi Szymon,

* Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com> [2012-06-29 13:56:53 +0300]:

> Hi Szymon & Gustavo,
> 
> On Wed, May 30, 2012, Szymon Janc wrote:
> > > > Some devices e.g. SonyEricsson Xperia ray and arc S don't do SDP search
> > > > before pairing. No L2CAP is connected so default HCI_DISCONN_TIMEOUT
> > > > (2 seconds) timeout value is being used. This results in problems with
> > > > legacy pairing as remote user has only few seconds to enter PIN before
> > > > ACL is disconnected.
> > > > 
> > > > Increase disconnect timeout to HCI_PAIRING_TIMEOUT if SSP is disabled
> > > > and no linkey exists.
> > > 
> > > does this only happen with SSP disabled?
> > 
> > Yes, I've seen this only with SSP disabled.
> > After name request remote devices ask user to enter PIN and before user is
> > able to do so (4 sec only) link is disconnected (cause we didn't get pin
> > request event yet).
> > 
> > For SSP hci_conn_hold is called in hci_io_capa_request_evt so link is not
> > disconnected.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Also add the hcidump output to the commit message would be helpful.
> > 
> > hcidump for ssp disabled [1] and ssp enabled [2] below.
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Szymon Janc <szymon.janc@tieto.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  net/bluetooth/hci_event.c |    7 ++++++-
> > > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> > > > index ac86b65..98e8020 100644
> > > > --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> > > > +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> > > > @@ -1762,7 +1762,12 @@ static void hci_conn_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > > >  		if (conn->type == ACL_LINK) {
> > > >  			conn->state = BT_CONFIG;
> > > >  			hci_conn_hold(conn);
> > > > -			conn->disc_timeout = HCI_DISCONN_TIMEOUT;
> > > > +
> > > > +			if (!hci_conn_ssp_enabled(conn) &&
> > > > +			    !hci_find_link_key(hdev, &ev->bdaddr))
> > 
> > I could add also checking if connection is incoming to narrow case a bit further...
> > 
> > > > +				conn->disc_timeout = HCI_PAIRING_TIMEOUT;
> > > > +			else
> > > > +				conn->disc_timeout = HCI_DISCONN_TIMEOUT;
> > > 
> > > You are also changing the timeout for a SDP search, for example, to
> > > HCI_PAIRING_TIMEOUT and this is not good. I think we need to be smarter here,
> > > we can't change the behaviour of things like SDP search here.
> > 
> > Maybe we could set timeout back to HCI_DICONN_TIMEOUT when l2cap is
> > connected (or disconnected)?  That should cover SDP search case..
> 
> What happened to getting this patch upstream? To me it looks like a
> definitely needed fix. After adding the fix to restore a sensible value
> for disc_timeout after an L2CAP connect request either way and adding a
> better explanation to the commit message (that we only get the PIN
> request after user has entered one on the remote side, including a
> hcidump of this) I think this should go upstream. If this had been
> processed in a timely manner it could have made it to 3.5 but now it
> seems too late for that (as it's not strictly speaking a regression from
> 3.4).

Could you re-do this patch as Johan says so we can try push it to 3.5?

	Gustavo

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-04  7:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-28  9:47 [PATCH 1/2] Bluetooth: Fix legacy pairing with some devices Szymon Janc
2012-05-28  9:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] Bluetooth: Remove unused HCI timeouts definitions Szymon Janc
2012-05-29 17:39   ` Gustavo Padovan
2012-05-29 17:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] Bluetooth: Fix legacy pairing with some devices Gustavo Padovan
2012-05-30  7:41   ` Szymon Janc
2012-06-29 10:56     ` Johan Hedberg
2012-07-04  7:56       ` Gustavo Padovan [this message]
2012-07-19  9:13         ` Szymon Janc
2012-07-19  9:34           ` Johan Hedberg
2012-07-19 10:17             ` Szymon Janc
2012-07-19 10:25               ` Johan Hedberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120704075641.GB21012@joana \
    --to=gustavo@padovan.org \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=szymon.janc@tieto.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox