From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>,
Yu-Chen Cho <acho@suse.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org list"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org development"
<linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: btmtk_usb: Add hdev parameter to hdev->send driver callback
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 06:29:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131115212936.GC14897@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F615BA13-BEC1-457B-8002-BC6C149039EA@holtmann.org>
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:26:41PM +0900, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> >> while this is patch is correct, I do not really care about staging drivers that actually bluntly violate my copyright.
> >>
> >
> > That's very cryptic.
> >
> > What is going on here? I googled it and I wasn't able to find what you
> > are talking about. Care to give us a hint and what you want us to do
> > here?
>
> the last time I checked, the majority of drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c has been written by myself. Now go and compare btusb.c to btmtk_usb.[ch].
>
> > I have also added Johan Hedberg to the CC list because he also helped
> > break the build. Don't do that.
>
> Yes, we are doing exactly that. It is a staging driver. I could not care less if a staging drivers breaks the build or not.
>
> If anybody cares about this driver, then take the time to merge it upstream. It has never been submitted to linux-bluetooth mailing list.
>
> There are drivers that should have never been merged into staging.
> This is one of them. Look for yourself and explain to me why this
> driver is part of staging in the first place.
Because it was sent to me by a developer?
Seriously, what's the issue here, I didn't notice it was a fork of your
code, sorry, I didn't check. I figured it would be eventually cleaned
up properly and then it will be sent to linux-bluetooth for proper
merging.
Yu-Chen, what's the satus of getting this cleaned up "properly"? You
haven't really done anything on this since I took the driver in May.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-15 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-15 12:07 [PATCH] Staging: btmtk_usb: Add hdev parameter to hdev->send driver callback Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-15 12:30 ` Marcel Holtmann
2013-11-15 13:08 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-11-15 13:26 ` Marcel Holtmann
2013-11-15 21:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2013-11-15 22:26 ` Marcel Holtmann
2013-11-15 22:36 ` Marcel Holtmann
2013-11-15 23:39 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131115212936.GC14897@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=acho@suse.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=johan.hedberg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).