From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:08:39 +0000 From: John Keeping To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Cc: Marcel Holtmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Install btattach with "make install" Message-ID: <20151210110839.1eb744e2.john@metanate.com> In-Reply-To: <1449052500-10755-1-git-send-email-john@metanate.com> References: <1449052500-10755-1-git-send-email-john@metanate.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII List-ID: On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:34:58 +0000, John Keeping wrote: > Following a discussion last week [1], it seems that btattach should be > used in preference to hciattach when possible. This series adds a > manual page for it and updates the makefile so that btattach is > installed via the standard mechanism. > > For now, btattach is still marked as experimental so it wil only be > built and installed when experimental features are enabled. > > [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/65807 Ping? Does anyone have any feedback on this? > John Keeping (2): > tools/btattach: add manual page > tools/btattach: install during "make install" > > Makefile.tools | 8 +++++++- > tools/btattach.1 | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 tools/btattach.1