From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
To: Steve Brown <sbrown@ewol.com>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BlueZ/mesh: RX not working after daemon restart (with workaround)
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 22:39:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191110213953.GX30475@aurel32.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a843f597a101bf6e74521d033b7af3ff19455adc.camel@ewol.com>
Hi,
On 2019-11-10 13:59, Steve Brown wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 21:08 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On my system (Raspberry PI 3), the RX path doesn't work anymore
> > following a restart of the bluetooth-meshd daemon. I have tracked
> > down
> > that to the fact that the receive callbacks are setup before the HCI
> > is
> > fully initialized. Said otherwise, BT_HCI_CMD_LE_SET_SCAN_PARAMETERS
> > is
> > called before BT_HCI_CMD_RESET and the callback calling
> > BT_HCI_CMD_LE_SET_SCAN_ENABLE is not called. This timing dependent
> > and
> > probably not reproducible on all hardware.
> >
> > I have workarounded the issue by adding a small delay between the HCI
> > initialization and the call to node_attach_io_all():
> >
> > diff --git a/mesh/mesh.c b/mesh/mesh.c
> > index 9b2b2073b..1c06060f9 100644
> > --- a/mesh/mesh.c
> > +++ b/mesh/mesh.c
> > @@ -167,6 +167,10 @@ bool mesh_init(const char *config_dir, enum
> > mesh_io_type type, void *opts)
> > mesh_io_get_caps(mesh.io, &caps);
> > mesh.max_filters = caps.max_num_filters;
> >
> > + for (int i = 0 ; i < 100 ; i++) {
> > + l_main_iterate(10);
> > + }
> > +
> > node_attach_io_all(mesh.io);
> >
> > return true;
> >
> > I guess there is a better way to do that by waiting for the HCI to be
> > fully initialized before calling node_attach_io_all() or by using a
> > callback instead. However I do not know the codebase good enough to
> > fix
> > that properly.
> >
> > Aurelien
> >
> I've experienced something similar on my rpi3. I found that on restart,
> discover-unprovisioned stopped working.
In my case I also observe the same.
> In my case, it appears that meshd assumes that if there are existing
> nodes, scanning has been enabled. Thus, calls from mesh-cfgclient to
> discover additional unprovisioned nodes do not need another hci scan
> enable at mesh/mesh-io-generic.c:736.
>
> If meshd is restarted with preexisting nodes, scanning is still assumed
> to already be enabled, but it's not. This breaks discover-unprovisioned
> for me.
Yes, I think this is exactly my problem. If there are existing nodes,
recv_register is called before the HCI is configured and pvt->rx_regs is
filled at mesh/mesh-io-generic.c:738. This means that later scanning is
assumed to be enabled. However the call to bt_hci_send with
BT_HCI_CMD_LE_SET_SCAN_PARAMETERS fails as the HCI is not yet
initialized and the callback set_recv_scan_enable() supposed to enable
scanning is not called.
So when loading a node, scanning is assumed to be enabled, but it is
not practice.
I believe my workaround should work on your system (maybe after
adjusting the number of iterations of the loop).
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-10 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-10 20:08 BlueZ/mesh: RX not working after daemon restart (with workaround) Aurelien Jarno
2019-11-10 20:59 ` Steve Brown
2019-11-10 21:39 ` Aurelien Jarno [this message]
2019-11-12 6:44 ` Stotland, Inga
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191110213953.GX30475@aurel32.net \
--to=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sbrown@ewol.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox