[PATCH v2] Bluetooth: Use kzalloc instead of kmalloc/memset

[PATCH v2] Bluetooth: Use kzalloc instead of kmalloc/memset

[Kang Minchul]

This commit replace kmalloc + memset to kzalloc
for better code readability and simplicity.

Following messages are related cocci warnings.

WARNING: kzalloc should be used for d, instead of kmalloc/memset

Signed-off-by: Kang Minchul <tegongkang@gmail.com>
---
V1 -> V2: Change subject prefix

 net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
index 7a59c4487050..287d313aa312 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
@@ -824,11 +824,10 @@ static int hci_le_terminate_big(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 big, u8 bis)
 
 	bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "big 0x%2.2x bis 0x%2.2x", big, bis);
 
-	d = kmalloc(sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL);
+	d = kzalloc(sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!d)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	memset(d, 0, sizeof(*d));
 	d->big = big;
 	d->bis = bis;
 
@@ -861,11 +860,10 @@ static int hci_le_big_terminate(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 big, u16 sync_handle)
 
 	bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "big 0x%2.2x sync_handle 0x%4.4x", big, sync_handle);
 
-	d = kmalloc(sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL);
+	d = kzalloc(sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!d)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	memset(d, 0, sizeof(*d));
 	d->big = big;
 	d->sync_handle = sync_handle;
 
-- 
2.34.1

RE: [v2] Bluetooth: Use kzalloc instead of kmalloc/memset

[bluez.test.bot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1261 bytes --]

This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=690188

---Test result---

Test Summary:
CheckPatch                    PASS      1.40 seconds
GitLint                       PASS      0.89 seconds
SubjectPrefix                 PASS      0.62 seconds
BuildKernel                   PASS      41.75 seconds
BuildKernel32                 PASS      36.54 seconds
Incremental Build with patchesPASS      56.77 seconds
TestRunner: Setup             PASS      607.79 seconds
TestRunner: l2cap-tester      PASS      19.67 seconds
TestRunner: iso-tester        PASS      19.76 seconds
TestRunner: bnep-tester       PASS      7.30 seconds
TestRunner: mgmt-tester       PASS      127.25 seconds
TestRunner: rfcomm-tester     PASS      13.28 seconds
TestRunner: sco-tester        PASS      12.15 seconds
TestRunner: ioctl-tester      PASS      14.10 seconds
TestRunner: mesh-tester       PASS      9.79 seconds
TestRunner: smp-tester        PASS      10.80 seconds
TestRunner: userchan-tester   PASS      7.76 seconds



---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth

Re: [PATCH v2] Bluetooth: Use kzalloc instead of kmalloc/memset

[Paul Menzel]

Dear Kang,


Thank you for the patch.


Am 29.10.22 um 23:40 schrieb Kang Minchul:
> This commit replace kmalloc + memset to kzalloc

replace*s*

(Though starting with “This commit …” is redundant.

> for better code readability and simplicity.
> 
> Following messages are related cocci warnings.

Maybe: This addresse the cocci warning below.

> WARNING: kzalloc should be used for d, instead of kmalloc/memset
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kang Minchul <tegongkang@gmail.com>
> ---
> V1 -> V2: Change subject prefix
> 
>   net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c | 6 ++----
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> index 7a59c4487050..287d313aa312 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> @@ -824,11 +824,10 @@ static int hci_le_terminate_big(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 big, u8 bis)
>   
>   	bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "big 0x%2.2x bis 0x%2.2x", big, bis);
>   
> -	d = kmalloc(sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	d = kzalloc(sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!d)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>   
> -	memset(d, 0, sizeof(*d));
>   	d->big = big;
>   	d->bis = bis;
>   
> @@ -861,11 +860,10 @@ static int hci_le_big_terminate(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 big, u16 sync_handle)
>   
>   	bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "big 0x%2.2x sync_handle 0x%4.4x", big, sync_handle);
>   
> -	d = kmalloc(sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	d = kzalloc(sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!d)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>   
> -	memset(d, 0, sizeof(*d));
>   	d->big = big;
>   	d->sync_handle = sync_handle;

Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>


Kind regards,

Paul

Re: [PATCH v2] Bluetooth: Use kzalloc instead of kmalloc/memset

[Kang Minchul]

> Am 29.10.22 um 23:40 schrieb Kang Minchul:
> > This commit replace kmalloc + memset to kzalloc
>
> replace*s*
>
> (Though starting with “This commit …” is redundant.
>
> > for better code readability and simplicity.
> >
> > Following messages are related cocci warnings.
>
> Maybe: This addresse the cocci warning below.
>
> > WARNING: kzalloc should be used for d, instead of kmalloc/memset
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kang Minchul <tegongkang@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > V1 -> V2: Change subject prefix
> >
> >   net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c | 6 ++----
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> > index 7a59c4487050..287d313aa312 100644
> > --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> > +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> > @@ -824,11 +824,10 @@ static int hci_le_terminate_big(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 big, u8 bis)
> >
> >       bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "big 0x%2.2x bis 0x%2.2x", big, bis);
> >
> > -     d = kmalloc(sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +     d = kzalloc(sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL);
> >       if (!d)
> >               return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > -     memset(d, 0, sizeof(*d));
> >       d->big = big;
> >       d->bis = bis;
> >
> > @@ -861,11 +860,10 @@ static int hci_le_big_terminate(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 big, u16 sync_handle)
> >
> >       bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "big 0x%2.2x sync_handle 0x%4.4x", big, sync_handle);
> >
> > -     d = kmalloc(sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +     d = kzalloc(sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL);
> >       if (!d)
> >               return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > -     memset(d, 0, sizeof(*d));
> >       d->big = big;
> >       d->sync_handle = sync_handle;
>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul

Thank you so much for your feedback!
Should I amend the previous commit message and resend PATCH v3?

regards,

Kang Minchul

Re: [PATCH v2] Bluetooth: Use kzalloc instead of kmalloc/memset

[Kang Minchul]

I just amended the message and sent patch v3.

Again, thanks for the feedback.

regards,

Kang Minchul