From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE8EA374D3; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 12:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718193883; cv=none; b=LlET33QSOzTncyRWdeRPSzpzYNpxE3epN1o4h5rv/l+GKmXfI+VJCGKlP9nUSvwSLi4pdevDHcehWNOrLW0/ARu8LodYFAl5Pa7cDFUAbafISC4HUq0caxxB2Vij3U5zAaz+vYmU1/K8skX4i7J6zbLIUvPh5ZMdZP93KqdB7T4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718193883; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2B9cF8w213BqeGDWK69iJPR4rJyOwb3Wh0NtbWC8BSI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VctAa6V1xUja74sWK7XJag17hm57+701RR6fNVNckCv7glIwsFNiuUSU2YdF442qoLfa8Hv/O2P2zkkaHvKaKe21KzdsMoTDbNvjKZb2aBsDWYc1d/d+pBPkQwIocvusbuN4HOMoevfaIIoXio/YaDXpxOd/JKPKwTuGS0/LDug= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=wjf2cfxV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="wjf2cfxV" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 61689C3277B; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 12:04:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1718193882; bh=2B9cF8w213BqeGDWK69iJPR4rJyOwb3Wh0NtbWC8BSI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=wjf2cfxVvoniGDsb1tz6Ftg/fWlITXjuLZfBhXwqHfHGPLmBcceqsBI4WaffaHixq hFwzr7Ti81rAXJSxdVvisD5qw9J38qmKXw8meK5ebUk5Fkyg9a9SOP4i27EnF1OpiS YtXhGSBaTpEopKZAbwIkr2i3roa9zOpBbTG9YFVY= Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:04:40 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: "stable@vger.kernel.org" , Marcel Holtmann , Johan Hedberg , Luiz Augusto von Dentz , linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, Paul Menzel , Sasha Levin , Jeremy =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lain=E9?= , Linux regressions mailing list , Mike Subject: Re: Bluetooth kernel BUG with Intel AX211 (regression in 6.1.83) Message-ID: <2024061258-boxy-plaster-7219@gregkh> References: <30f4b18f-4b96-403c-a0ab-d81809d9888a@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 12:18:18PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 03.06.24 22:03, Mike wrote: > > On 29.05.24 11:06, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> Might be a good idea to share it, the developers might want to confirm > >> it's really the same bug. > > I'm attaching the stacktrace [1] and decodecode [2] at the end, generated > > on 6.1.92 vanilla+patch (1.). > > [...] > > I understand that 6.9-rc5[1] worked fine, but I guess it will take some > > time to be > > included in Debian stable, so having a patch for 6.1.x will be much > > appreciated. > > I do not have the time to follow the vanilla (latest) release as is > > likely the case for > > many other Linux users. > > > > Let me know if there's anything else useful I can do for you. > > Thank you, > > Still no reaction from the bluetooth developers. Guess they are busy > and/or do not care about 6.1.y. In that case: > > @Greg: do you might have an idea how the 6.1.y commit a13f316e90fdb1 > ("Bluetooth: hci_conn: Consolidate code for aborting connections") might > cause this or if it's missing some per-requisite? If not I wonder if > reverting that patch from 6.1.y might be the best move to resolve this > regression. Mike earlier in > https://lore.kernel.org/all/c947e600-e126-43ea-9530-0389206bef5e@gmail.com/ > confirmed that this fixed the problem in tests. Jeremy (who started the > thread and afaics has the same problem) did not reply. How was this reverted? I get a bunch of conflicts as this commit was added as a dependency of a patch later in the series. So if this wants to be reverted from 6.1.y, can someone send me the revert that has been tested to work? thanks, greg k-h