public inbox for linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: pip-izony <eeodqql09@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
	Kyungtae Kim <Kyungtae.Kim@dartmouth.edu>,
	Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: bfusb: Fix buffer over-read in rx processing loop
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 06:58:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025100813-thicken-snowfall-0d4d@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251007232941.3742133-2-eeodqql09@gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 07:29:42PM -0400, pip-izony wrote:
> From: Seungjin Bae <eeodqql09@gmail.com>
> 
> The bfusb_rx_complete() function parses incoming URB data in while loop.
> The logic does not sufficiently validate the remaining buffer size(count)
> accross loop iterations, which can lead to a buffer over-read.
> 
> For example, with 4-bytes remaining buffer, if the first iteration takes
> the `hdr & 0x4000` branch, 2-bytes are consumed. On the next iteration,
> only 2-bytes remain, but the else branch is trying to access the third
> byte(buf[2]). This causes an out-of-bounds read and a potential kernel panic.
> 
> This patch fixes the vulnerability by adding checks to ensure enough
> data remains in the buffer before it is accessed.
> 
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Signed-off-by: Seungjin Bae <eeodqql09@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/bluetooth/bfusb.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/bfusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/bfusb.c
> index 8df310983bf6..f17eae6dbd7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/bfusb.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/bfusb.c
> @@ -360,6 +360,10 @@ static void bfusb_rx_complete(struct urb *urb)
>  			count -= 2;
>  			buf   += 2;
>  		} else {
> +            if (count < 3) {
> +                bf_dev_err(data->hdev, "block header is too short");
> +                break;
> +            }
>  			len = (buf[2] == 0) ? 256 : buf[2];
>  			count -= 3;
>  			buf   += 3;
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 

<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-08  4:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-07 23:29 [PATCH] Bluetooth: bfusb: Fix buffer over-read in rx processing loop pip-izony
2025-10-08  1:17 ` bluez.test.bot
2025-10-08  1:56 ` [PATCH v2] " pip-izony
2025-10-08  3:01   ` [v2] " bluez.test.bot
2025-10-08  3:51   ` [PATCH v2] " Paul Menzel
2025-10-09  2:57     ` [PATCH v3] " pip-izony
2025-10-09  3:50       ` [v3] " bluez.test.bot
2025-10-09  7:01       ` [PATCH v3] " Paul Menzel
2025-10-09 16:48         ` [PATCH v4] " pip-izony
2025-10-09 17:14           ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2025-10-09 17:34           ` [v4] " bluez.test.bot
2025-10-08  4:58 ` Greg KH [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025100813-thicken-snowfall-0d4d@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=Kyungtae.Kim@dartmouth.edu \
    --cc=eeodqql09@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox