From: <w15303746062@163.com>
To: pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de, marcel@holtmann.org, luiz.dentz@gmail.com,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
greg@kroah.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Mingyu Wang <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v3] Bluetooth: hci_uart: fix UAF in hci_uart_tty_close()
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 14:50:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260515065009.383265-1-w15303746062@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <505b56bd-e5fd-4feb-a6e3-1d8269609277@molgen.mpg.de>
From: Mingyu Wang <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn>
A Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability and a subsequent kernel panic were
observed in hci_uart_write_work() due to a race condition between the
initialization of the HCI UART line discipline and concurrent TTY hangup.
This issue was triggered by our custom device emulation and fuzzing
framework (DevGen) on the v6.18 kernel. Due to the highly timing-dependent
nature of this race condition (requiring a precise interleaving of
TIOCVHANGUP and protocol setup), Syzkaller failed to extract a reliable
standalone C reproducer (reproducer is too unreliable: 0.00).
The crash trace is as follows:
ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object: ffff88804024e870 object type: work_struct hint: hci_uart_write_work+0x0/0x940
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 338273 at lib/debugobjects.c:612 debug_print_object+0x1a2/0x2b0
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x3ec/0x520
kfree+0x3f0/0x6c0
hci_uart_tty_close+0x127/0x2a0
tty_ldisc_close+0x113/0x1a0
tty_ldisc_kill+0x8e/0x150
tty_ldisc_hangup+0x3c1/0x730
__tty_hangup.part.0+0x3fd/0x8a0
tty_ioctl+0x120f/0x1690
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x18f/0x210
do_syscall_64+0xcb/0xfa0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
</TASK>
The issue arises because the workqueues (init_ready and write_work) are
only cancelled if the HCI_UART_PROTO_READY flag is set. However, during
the protocol initialization phase (HCI_UART_PROTO_INIT), the underlying
protocol may schedule work. If a hangup occurs before the setup completes
and the READY flag is set, hci_uart_tty_close() skips the cancel_work_sync()
calls and proceeds to free the `hu` struct. When the delayed workqueue
executes, it blindly dereferences the freed `hu` struct.
Fix this by moving the cancel_work_sync() calls outside the
HCI_UART_PROTO_READY check, ensuring that any pending works are
unconditionally cancelled before the hci_uart structure is freed.
Note that hu->init_ready and hu->write_work are initialized in
hci_uart_tty_open(), so it is always safe to call cancel_work_sync()
on them in hci_uart_tty_close(), even if the protocol was never
fully attached.
Fixes: 3b799254cf6f ("Bluetooth: hci_uart: Cancel init work before unregistering")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mingyu Wang <25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn>
---
Changes in v3:
- Added 'Cc: stable' tag as requested by the stable bot.
Changes in v2:
- Added KASAN/ODEBUG crash trace.
drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c
index 275ea865bc29..566e1c525ee2 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c
@@ -544,14 +544,18 @@ static void hci_uart_tty_close(struct tty_struct *tty)
if (hdev)
hci_uart_close(hdev);
+ /*
+ * Always cancel workqueues unconditionally before freeing the hu
+ * struct, as they might be active during the PROTO_INIT phase.
+ */
+ cancel_work_sync(&hu->init_ready);
+ cancel_work_sync(&hu->write_work);
+
if (test_bit(HCI_UART_PROTO_READY, &hu->flags)) {
percpu_down_write(&hu->proto_lock);
clear_bit(HCI_UART_PROTO_READY, &hu->flags);
percpu_up_write(&hu->proto_lock);
- cancel_work_sync(&hu->init_ready);
- cancel_work_sync(&hu->write_work);
-
if (hdev) {
if (test_bit(HCI_UART_REGISTERED, &hu->flags))
hci_unregister_dev(hdev);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-15 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 6:45 [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_uart: fix UAF in hci_uart_tty_close() w15303746062
2026-05-13 7:54 ` bluez.test.bot
2026-05-13 9:04 ` [PATCH] " Paul Menzel
2026-05-14 15:17 ` [PATCH v2] " w15303746062
2026-05-14 17:00 ` [v2] " bluez.test.bot
2026-05-15 6:10 ` [PATCH v2] " Greg KH
2026-05-15 6:50 ` w15303746062 [this message]
2026-05-15 8:43 ` [v3] " bluez.test.bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260515065009.383265-1-w15303746062@163.com \
--to=w15303746062@163.com \
--cc=25181214217@stu.xidian.edu.cn \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox