From: Muhammad Bilal <meatuni001@gmail.com>
To: michael.bommarito@gmail.com
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
marcel@holtmann.org, luiz.dentz@gmail.com,
johan.hedberg@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: L2CAP: rate-limit ECHO_RSP per signaling PDU
Date: Sun, 17 May 2026 21:00:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260518010019.121323-1-meatuni001@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260518002800.1361430-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the patch. The ECHO_REQ cap addresses one amplification
vector, but the same N:1 amplification appears reachable via the
unknown-command path in the same loop.
When l2cap_bredr_sig_cmd() returns an error for an unrecognised command
code, the loop calls l2cap_sig_send_rej() unconditionally:
err = l2cap_bredr_sig_cmd(conn, cmd, len, skb->data);
if (err) {
BT_ERR("Wrong link type (%d)", err);
l2cap_sig_send_rej(conn, cmd->ident);
}
A peer that packs N commands with an unknown code (e.g. 0xFF, len = 0)
into a single signaling PDU would trigger N calls to
l2cap_sig_send_rej(), sending N COMMAND_REJ responses,
bypassing the new L2CAP_SIG_ECHO_BURST limit entirely. This produces
the same TX queue saturation the patch intends to prevent, and also
floods the kernel log with N BT_ERR() writes per PDU.
A response counter covering all outbound responses generated per PDU
would close both paths. Something like:
int resp_count = 0;
/* in the error path: */
if (err) {
if (++resp_count <= L2CAP_SIG_ECHO_BURST) {
BT_ERR("Wrong link type (%d)", err);
l2cap_sig_send_rej(conn, cmd->ident);
}
continue;
}
/* existing echo path: */
if (cmd->code == L2CAP_ECHO_REQ &&
++resp_count > L2CAP_SIG_ECHO_BURST) {
skb_pull(skb, len);
continue;
}
Using pr_warn_ratelimited() instead of BT_ERR() in the loop would
also reduce log amplification independent of the skb path.
Regards,
Muhammad Bilal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-18 1:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-18 0:28 [PATCH] Bluetooth: L2CAP: rate-limit ECHO_RSP per signaling PDU Michael Bommarito
2026-05-18 1:00 ` Muhammad Bilal [this message]
2026-05-18 1:03 ` Michael Bommarito
2026-05-18 21:27 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2026-05-18 21:37 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2026-05-19 0:42 ` Michael Bommarito
2026-05-19 16:02 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2026-05-18 2:04 ` bluez.test.bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260518010019.121323-1-meatuni001@gmail.com \
--to=meatuni001@gmail.com \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=michael.bommarito@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox