Linux bluetooth development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Szymon Janc <szymon.janc@tieto.com>
To: Ravi kumar Veeramally <ravikumar.veeramally@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] android/hidhost: Fix miscalculation of get report event struct length
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:22:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2481120.IZcvT0pjE9@uw000953> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389914751-18545-3-git-send-email-ravikumar.veeramally@linux.intel.com>

Hi Ravi,

On Friday 17 of January 2014 01:25:42 Ravi kumar Veeramally wrote:
> ---
>  android/hal-hidhost.c | 3 ++-
>  android/hidhost.c     | 3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/android/hal-hidhost.c b/android/hal-hidhost.c
> index fd3ad2d..5445d08 100644
> --- a/android/hal-hidhost.c
> +++ b/android/hal-hidhost.c
> @@ -73,7 +73,8 @@ static void handle_get_report(void *buf, uint16_t len)
>  {
>  	struct hal_ev_hidhost_get_report *ev = buf;
>  
> -	if (len != sizeof(*ev) + ev->len) {
> +	if (len != sizeof(*ev) + sizeof(struct hal_ev_hidhost_get_report)
> +								+ ev->len) {

I don't understand this change. We have header and data len. There should be
no need for any extra calculations.


>  		error("invalid get report event, aborting");
>  		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>  	}
> diff --git a/android/hidhost.c b/android/hidhost.c
> index c004063..8a2668c 100644
> --- a/android/hidhost.c
> +++ b/android/hidhost.c
> @@ -371,13 +371,14 @@ static void bt_hid_notify_get_report(struct hid_device *dev, uint8_t *buf,
>  	ba2str(&dev->dst, address);
>  	DBG("device %s", address);
>  
> -	ev_len = sizeof(*ev) + sizeof(struct hal_ev_hidhost_get_report) + 1;
> +	ev_len = sizeof(*ev) + sizeof(struct hal_ev_hidhost_get_report);

I don't understand why there is double sizeof() in first place.(*ev is same type)

>  
>  	if (!((buf[0] == (HID_MSG_DATA | HID_DATA_TYPE_INPUT)) ||
>  			(buf[0] == (HID_MSG_DATA | HID_DATA_TYPE_OUTPUT)) ||
>  			(buf[0]	== (HID_MSG_DATA | HID_DATA_TYPE_FEATURE)))) {
>  		ev = g_malloc0(ev_len);
>  		ev->status = buf[0];
> +		ev->len = 0;
>  		bdaddr2android(&dev->dst, ev->bdaddr);
>  		goto send;
>  	}

I have a feeling that there is something wrong with ev_len calculations in
bt_hid_notify_get_report(). I'd rather prefer to have this function properly
fixed (and possibly refactored on how it handles ev data allocation).
 

-- 
Best regards, 
Szymon Janc

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-20 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-16 23:25 [PATCH 00/11] HIDHost E2E tests and fixes Ravi kumar Veeramally
2014-01-16 23:25 ` [PATCH 01/11] android/hidhost: Fix connection state notification on profile unregister Ravi kumar Veeramally
2014-01-16 23:25 ` [PATCH 02/11] android/hidhost: Fix miscalculation of get report event struct length Ravi kumar Veeramally
2014-01-20 15:22   ` Szymon Janc [this message]
2014-01-16 23:25 ` [PATCH 03/11] android/hidhost: Remove unnecessary check Ravi kumar Veeramally
2014-01-16 23:25 ` [PATCH 04/11] android/tester: Add HIDhost Connect test Ravi kumar Veeramally
2014-01-16 23:25 ` [PATCH 05/11] android/tester: Add HIDhost Disconnect test Ravi kumar Veeramally
2014-01-16 23:25 ` [PATCH 06/11] android/tester: Add HIDhost VirtualUnplug test Ravi kumar Veeramally
2014-01-16 23:25 ` [PATCH 07/11] android/tester: Add HIDhost GetProtocol test Ravi kumar Veeramally
2014-01-16 23:25 ` [PATCH 08/11] android/tester: Add HIDhost SetProtocol test Ravi kumar Veeramally
2014-01-16 23:25 ` [PATCH 09/11] android/tester: Add HIDhost GetReport test Ravi kumar Veeramally
2014-01-16 23:25 ` [PATCH 10/11] android/tester: Add HIDhost SetReport test Ravi kumar Veeramally
2014-01-16 23:25 ` [PATCH 11/11] android/tester: Add HIDhost SendData test Ravi kumar Veeramally
2014-01-20 15:30 ` [PATCH 00/11] HIDHost E2E tests and fixes Szymon Janc
2014-01-20 18:08   ` Ravi kumar Veeramally

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2481120.IZcvT0pjE9@uw000953 \
    --to=szymon.janc@tieto.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ravikumar.veeramally@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox