From: Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@gmail.com>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org,
BlueZ Mailing List <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [KJ] Re: [PATCH 19/20] bluetooth/bluecard_cs: remove interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() usage
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 14:19:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29495f1d050206141977a6b4fa@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1107562301.6921.115.camel@pegasus>
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 01:11:41 +0100, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> wrote:
> Hi Nish,
>
> > > > Please consider applying.
> > > >
> > > > Description: Remove deprecated interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() function calls
> > > > and replace with direct wait-queue usage. Some naming conflicts occurred, which
> > > > I tried to resolve appropriately. Patch is compile-tested.
> > >
> > > you introduce more code than you remove. Is our code a special case or
> > > why don't exists a simple API function as replacement?
> >
> > Yes, I do. *sleep_on*() was the API, which has been replaced with wait_event*().
> > However, wait_event*() explicitly needs a condition (the "event"), which in
> > thise case does not exist. If I had more background, I would have gone the
> > wait_event*() route. I am looking into a better API to mask away all of the
> > DEFINE_WAIT(), prepare_to_wait(), schedule()/schedule_timeout(), finish_wait()
> > additions (the KJ list can attest to how many of these replacements I'm doing),
> > but there simply does not exist such an API right now.
> >
> > Any input you could provide, though, would be greatly appreciated.
>
> I gave your patch a shot and the oops below happens on a 2.6.11-rc3
> after plugging in the card. Without the patch it is working.
Sorry for the long delay without a response!
That looks like I may have missed some wake-up related issues. I'll
check on it and get back to you soon.
Thanks,
Nish
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-06 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20050202225855.GY2546@us.ibm.com>
2005-02-02 23:16 ` [Bluez-devel] Re: [PATCH 19/20] bluetooth/bluecard_cs: remove interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() usage Marcel Holtmann
2005-02-03 0:25 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-02-05 0:11 ` [Bluez-devel] " Marcel Holtmann
2005-02-06 22:19 ` Nish Aravamudan [this message]
2005-02-06 22:38 ` [Bluez-devel] Re: [KJ] " Marcel Holtmann
2005-02-18 23:43 ` Domen Puncer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=29495f1d050206141977a6b4fa@mail.gmail.com \
--to=nish.aravamudan@gmail.com \
--cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox