From: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] adapter: Use regular discovery for filters which only have discoverable set
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:03:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39877b39f5575cbfc89e567cb082741b47d02654.camel@hadess.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230330211233.102136-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>
Top posting to comment on the subject. It should have "[BlueZ PATCH]"
as the prefix so that the user-space CI runs on it.
On Thu, 2023-03-30 at 23:12 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> discovery_filter_to_mgmt_cp() does not add
> discovery_filter.discoverable
> to the created mgmt_cp_start_service_discovery struct.
>
> Instead update_discovery_filter() seprately checks
> client->discovery_filter->discoverable for all clients.
"separately".
> This means that for discovery-filters which only have the
> discoverable
> flag set, to put the adapter in discoverable mode while discovering,
> the created mgmt_cp_start_service_discovery struct is empty.
>
> This empty mgmt_cp_start_service_discovery struct then gets send
"sent"
> to the kernel as part of a MGMT_OP_START_SERVICE_DISCOVERY msg
> by start_discovery_timeout().
>
> This use of an empty filter with MGMT_OP_START_SERVICE_DISCOVERY
> causes some bluetooth devices to not get seen with some (most?)
> Broadcom bluetooth adapters. This problem has been observed with
> the following Broadcom models: BCM4343A0, BCM43430A1, BCM43341B0 .
>
> On these models the following 2 devices were not being discovered
> when starting a scan with a filter with just discoverable set
> in the filter (as gnome-bluetooth does):
>
> Device 09:02:01:03:0F:87 (public)
> Name: Bluetooth 3.0 Keyboard
> Alias: Bluetooth 3.0 Keyboard
> Class: 0x00000540
> Icon: input-keyboard
> Paired: yes
> Bonded: yes
> Trusted: yes
> Blocked: no
> Connected: yes
> WakeAllowed: yes
> LegacyPairing: yes
> UUID: Service Discovery Serve.. (00001000-0000-1000-8000-
> 00805f9b34fb)
> UUID: Human Interface Device... (00001124-0000-1000-8000-
> 00805f9b34fb)
> UUID: PnP Information (00001200-0000-1000-8000-
> 00805f9b34fb)
> Modalias: bluetooth:v05ACp022Cd011B
>
> Device 00:60:D1:00:00:34 (public)
> Name: Bluetooth Mouse
> Alias: Bluetooth Mouse
> Class: 0x00002580
> Icon: input-mouse
> Paired: yes
> Bonded: yes
> Trusted: yes
> Blocked: no
> Connected: yes
> WakeAllowed: yes
> LegacyPairing: no
> UUID: Human Interface Device... (00001124-0000-1000-8000-
> 00805f9b34fb)
> UUID: PnP Information (00001200-0000-1000-8000-
> 00805f9b34fb)
> Modalias: usb:v0103p0204d001E
>
> Since setting the discoverable flag on a filter only is a way to
> automatically put the adapter in discoverable mode itself while
> it is discovering; and since this does not any device filtering
> at all; modify merge_discovery_filters() to treat discovery with
> such filters as regular unfiltered discovery.
>
> This results in start_discovery_timeout() starting regular
> discovery through a MGMT_OP_START_DISCOVERY message and this
> fixes these 2 example devices not getting discovered by the
> mentioned Broadcom BT adapter models.
>
> Link:
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-bluetooth/-/merge_requests/163
> ---
> Note the same argument can be made for the pattern and duplicate part
> of
> the filters which also get handled outside of the kernel filter.
> But I prefer to keep the first patch small and targetted at solving
> things
> not working with the gnome-bluetooth filter settings.
>
> Also I'm not familiar enough with the code to say with certainty that
> filters with just a pattern or the duplicate flag set (or a
> combination)
> should also be treated as unfiltered discovery.
> ---
> src/adapter.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/adapter.c b/src/adapter.c
> index 7947160a6..cc7f891d9 100644
> --- a/src/adapter.c
> +++ b/src/adapter.c
> @@ -2192,6 +2192,7 @@ static int merge_discovery_filters(struct
> btd_adapter *adapter, int *rssi,
> bool empty_uuid = false;
> bool has_regular_discovery = false;
> bool has_filtered_discovery = false;
> + uint8_t adapter_scan_type = get_scan_type(adapter);
>
> for (l = adapter->discovery_list; l != NULL; l =
> g_slist_next(l)) {
> struct discovery_client *client = l->data;
> @@ -2202,6 +2203,20 @@ static int merge_discovery_filters(struct
> btd_adapter *adapter, int *rssi,
> continue;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Detect empty filter with only discoverable
> + * (which does not require a kernel filter) set.
> + */
> + if (item->uuids == NULL &&
> + item->pathloss == DISTANCE_VAL_INVALID &&
> + item->rssi == DISTANCE_VAL_INVALID &&
> + item->type == adapter_scan_type &&
> + item->duplicate == false &&
> + item->pattern == NULL) {
I would have split this chunky "if" into a separate function, but
otherwise the logic looks good.
Reviewed-by: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
> + has_regular_discovery = true;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> has_filtered_discovery = true;
>
> *transport |= item->type;
> @@ -2251,7 +2266,7 @@ static int merge_discovery_filters(struct
> btd_adapter *adapter, int *rssi,
> * It there is both regular and filtered scan
> running, then
> * clear whole fitler to report all devices.
> */
> - *transport = get_scan_type(adapter);
> + *transport = adapter_scan_type;
> *rssi = HCI_RSSI_INVALID;
> g_slist_free(*uuids);
> *uuids = NULL;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-30 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-30 21:12 [PATCH] adapter: Use regular discovery for filters which only have discoverable set Hans de Goede
2023-03-30 22:03 ` Bastien Nocera [this message]
2023-03-30 22:25 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2023-03-30 22:42 ` bluez.test.bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39877b39f5575cbfc89e567cb082741b47d02654.camel@hadess.net \
--to=hadess@hadess.net \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox