RE: [PATCH v4 2/4] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add support for QTI Bluetooth chip wcn6855

["Tim Jiang (QUIC)" <quic_tjiang@quicinc.com>]

Hi Luiz and all:
  I am QC bt host guys,  today I sync up with qc btfw team and conclude following result:
1: as I mentioned before, qca2066 and wcn6855 are the same chip family, and they can share the same btfw patch, and distinguish by using different nvm based on board id.
2: I upload the btfw previously for qca2066 , you can refer to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/commit/?id=2ba1beaae0c649ce8a50baecc8df9e81cd524e65 , and also wcn6855 can share to use btfw patch and nvm with qca2066.

3:steev patch does not include read board id part logical , I think it is better combine the steev  patch and my patch into one.

Regards.
Tim
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com> 
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2023 5:38 AM
To: Tim Jiang (QUIC) <quic_tjiang@quicinc.com>
Cc: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add support for QTI Bluetooth chip wcn6855

Hi Tim,

On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 12:45 AM Tim Jiang (QUIC) <quic_tjiang@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
> Hi steev:
>
> 6855 and 2066 are the same chip, the difference is 6855 use 2 ANT and 2066 use 3 ANT , but we have many nvm configs for 2066 and 6855 , that is the same , you can refer to I ever add support for 6855 usb .

Could you please review Steev changes, also if you could please refactor the code regarding the soc_type, making the necessary field as part of the data structure should make it a lot easier to add support for new configurations without having to change the code in multiple places.

> Regards.
> Tim
>
>


--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz