From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)" <bugs-a21@moonlit-rail.com>
Cc: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression: Inoperative bluetooth, Intel chipset, mainline kernel 6.6.2+
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 11:12:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d3b8fd3-a1b9-9793-b709-eda447ebd1ab@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2023120329-length-strum-9ee1@gregkh>
On 3.12.2023 10.38, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 03:32:52AM -0500, Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) wrote:
>> Greg KH wrote:
>>> Thanks for testing, any chance you can try 6.6.4-rc1? Or wait a few
>>> hours for me to release 6.6.4 if you don't want to mess with a -rc
>>> release.
>>
>> As I mentioned to Greg off-list (to save wasting other peoples' bandwidth),
>> I couldn't find 6.6.4-rc1. Looking in wrong git tree? But 6.6.4 is now
>> out, which I have tested and am running at the moment, albeit with the
>> problem commit from 6.6.2 backed out.
>>
>> There is no change with respect to this bug. The problematic patch
>> introduced in 6.6.2 was neither reverted nor amended. The "opcode 0x0c03
>> failed" lines to the kernel log continue to be present.
>>
>>> Also, is this showing up in 6.7-rc3? If so, that would be a big help in
>>> tracking this down.
>>
>> The bug shows up in 6.7-rc3 as well, exactly as it does here in 6.6.2+ and
>> in 6.1.63+. The problematic patch bisected earlier appears identically (and
>> seems to have been introduced simultaneously) in these recent releases.
>
> Ok, in a way, this is good as that means I haven't missed a fix, but bad
> in that this does affect everyone more.
>
> So let's start over, you found the offending commit, and nothing has
> fixed it, so what do we do? xhci/amd developers, any ideas?
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
I suggest reverting these two patches from everywhere (all stable):
a5d6264b638e xhci: Enable RPM on controllers that support low-power states
4baf12181509 xhci: Loosen RPM as default policy to cover for AMD xHC 1.1
Then write a new well tested patch that adds default runtime pm to those AMD
hosts that support it. And only add that to usb-next
-Mathias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-04 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-01 1:54 Regression: Inoperative bluetooth, Intel chipset, mainline kernel 6.6.2+ Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
2023-12-01 6:27 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-12-01 8:19 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
2023-12-01 8:27 ` Paul Menzel
2023-12-03 12:17 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2023-12-03 18:46 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
2023-12-01 6:33 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-12-01 8:15 ` Greg KH
2023-12-02 6:43 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
2023-12-02 7:23 ` Paul Menzel
2023-12-02 7:50 ` Greg KH
2023-12-02 7:58 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
2023-12-02 8:15 ` Greg KH
2023-12-03 8:32 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
2023-12-03 8:38 ` Greg KH
2023-12-03 16:16 ` Basavaraj Natikar
2023-12-03 16:24 ` Basavaraj Natikar
2023-12-03 19:52 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2023-12-04 9:12 ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2023-12-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "xhci: Enable RPM on controllers that support low-power states" Mathias Nyman
2023-12-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] Revert "xhci: Loosen RPM as default policy to cover for AMD xHC 1.1" Mathias Nyman
2023-12-04 10:14 ` [1/2] Revert "xhci: Enable RPM on controllers that support low-power states" bluez.test.bot
2023-12-04 10:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Basavaraj Natikar
2023-12-04 14:22 ` Mathias Nyman
2023-12-04 14:49 ` Basavaraj Natikar
2023-12-04 15:06 ` Mathias Nyman
2023-12-04 15:29 ` Basavaraj Natikar
2023-12-04 23:55 ` Greg KH
2023-12-05 9:05 ` [PATCH v2] Revert "xhci: Loosen RPM as default policy to cover for AMD xHC 1.1" Mathias Nyman
2023-12-05 9:13 ` [v2] " bluez.test.bot
2023-12-05 18:36 ` [PATCH v2] " Mario Limonciello
2023-12-15 16:53 ` patchwork-bot+bluetooth
2023-12-15 16:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "xhci: Enable RPM on controllers that support low-power states" patchwork-bot+bluetooth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d3b8fd3-a1b9-9793-b709-eda447ebd1ab@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com \
--cc=bugs-a21@moonlit-rail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).