Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] Bluetooth: mediatek: add gpio pin to reset bt

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 23/06/2025 12:23, Zhangchao Zhang wrote:
> Makes the platform Bluetooth to be reset by hardware pin,
> it provides two methods to do it for mediatek controller,
> and it has been tested locally many times and can reset normally.
> 
> When an exception occurs, resetting Bluetooth by hardware pin
> is more stable than resetting Bluetooth by software.
> If the corresponding pin is not found in dts,
> bluetooth can also be reset successfully.
> 
> Co-developed: Hao Qin <hao.qin@mediatek.com>
> Co-developed: Chris Lu <chris.lu@mediatek.com>
> Co-developed: Jiande Lu <jiande.lu@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhangchao Zhang <ot_zhangchao.zhang@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.h |  5 +++
>  2 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
> index 4390fd571dbd..3e5f3ca6f0d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
>  #include <linux/firmware.h>
>  #include <linux/usb.h>
>  #include <linux/iopoll.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>  #include <linux/unaligned.h>
>  
>  #include <net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h>
> @@ -109,6 +111,65 @@ static void btmtk_coredump_notify(struct hci_dev *hdev, int state)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void btmtk_reset_by_gpio_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	struct btmtk_reset_gpio *reset_gpio_data =
> +			container_of(work, struct btmtk_reset_gpio, reset_work.work);
> +
> +	gpio_direction_output(reset_gpio_data->gpio_number, 1);
> +	kfree(reset_gpio_data);
> +}
> +
> +static int btmtk_reset_by_gpio(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> +{
> +	struct btmtk_data *data = hci_get_priv(hdev);
> +	struct btmtk_reset_gpio *reset_gpio_data;
> +	struct device_node *node;
> +	int reset_gpio_number;
> +
> +	node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "mediatek,usb-bluetooth");


Can you finally respond to the comments you got weeks ago at v1?

NAK and I will keep NAKing your patches because total disregard to
review is not going to make this patch accepted.


Best regards,
Krzysztof