Re: [Bluez-devel] Questions about BlueZ in commercial use

Nicholas A. Preyss
2004-06-27T19:10:16Z

On 0, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> wrote:
> > Why doesn't BlueZ have a "stable version"?
> > Do you have any plan to have a "stable version" of BlueZ?
>
> That is wrong. BlueZ itself is stable. Speaking about the kernel part
> then every code in a stable kernel like 2.4 and 2.6 is stable. Bugs
> exists and later kernel releases are more stable than previous, but
> every BlueZ code in the kernel can be considered as stable.

I wouldn't consider 2.6. as stable. And i think it is not recommend to
use anything related to USB with 2.6. in a commercial standalone device.

nicholas