public inbox for linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Monjo Florit <pedro.monjo@futurlink.com>
To: bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] malloc & free
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:12:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42538BC5.7060106@futurlink.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1112554711.8263.13.camel@pegasus>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2051 bytes --]

Marcel Holtmann wrote:
>Hi Pedro,
>
>  
>>In the application I am developing, I want to log some information about 
>>Bluetooth devices, pretty much like "sdptool browse" and "hcitool info" 
>>do. In the code of these applications, there are calls to some library 
>>functions like hci_dflagstostr(), hci_lmtostr()... that create a string 
>>with information about the device (flags, features, etc.).
>>
>>The problem with these functions is that they call malloc(), expecting 
>>the caller to call free(). The problem with that is that this approach 
>>is not save, as it is not guaranteed that calling malloc() in a library 
>>function and free() in the main program works. In fact, I have seen a 
>>segmentation fault doing that.
>>    
>
>explain why this is not safe.
>  
I am not an expert in these issues, but I have read many times that 
there is no guarantee that the malloc/free implementation is the same in 
the main program and in the libraries. This is due to how the different 
modules are compiled: compiler version, compile flags, etc. But, as I 
said, I am not 100% sure. I am quite sure that I have read this for 
Windows, but maybe (probably) Linux is different.
>  
>>AFAIK, there are two alternatives: either the library functions expect a 
>>buffer (and its size) to be filled or malloc() and free() are both done 
>>within the library, which means creating a new library function call for 
>>freeing buffers allocated with malloc(). Are any of this alternatives 
>>implemented or on the roadmap? What workaround do you suggest?
>>    
>
>We can do that, but it is not on my roadmap. Send my patches for it and
>I will review them.
The easiest way to do it (and to continue with the actual API without 
modifications) would be to have a function call like:

void hci_str_free(char *str)
{
    free(str);
}

So after a call to hci_dflagstostr() (for example), the resulting 
pointer should be freed with hci_str_free(). In any case, there is one 
exception: hci_dtypetostr(); it returns a pointer to static data.

Cheers,

Pedro

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2693 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-06  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-31 16:30 [Bluez-users] malloc & free Pedro Monjo Florit
2005-04-03 18:58 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-04-06  7:12   ` Pedro Monjo Florit [this message]
2005-04-06  7:33     ` Xavier Garreau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42538BC5.7060106@futurlink.com \
    --to=pedro.monjo@futurlink.com \
    --cc=bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox