From: Pedro Monjo Florit <pedro.monjo@futurlink.com>
To: bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] malloc & free
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:12:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42538BC5.7060106@futurlink.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1112554711.8263.13.camel@pegasus>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2051 bytes --]
Marcel Holtmann wrote:
>Hi Pedro,
>
>
>>In the application I am developing, I want to log some information about
>>Bluetooth devices, pretty much like "sdptool browse" and "hcitool info"
>>do. In the code of these applications, there are calls to some library
>>functions like hci_dflagstostr(), hci_lmtostr()... that create a string
>>with information about the device (flags, features, etc.).
>>
>>The problem with these functions is that they call malloc(), expecting
>>the caller to call free(). The problem with that is that this approach
>>is not save, as it is not guaranteed that calling malloc() in a library
>>function and free() in the main program works. In fact, I have seen a
>>segmentation fault doing that.
>>
>
>explain why this is not safe.
>
I am not an expert in these issues, but I have read many times that
there is no guarantee that the malloc/free implementation is the same in
the main program and in the libraries. This is due to how the different
modules are compiled: compiler version, compile flags, etc. But, as I
said, I am not 100% sure. I am quite sure that I have read this for
Windows, but maybe (probably) Linux is different.
>
>>AFAIK, there are two alternatives: either the library functions expect a
>>buffer (and its size) to be filled or malloc() and free() are both done
>>within the library, which means creating a new library function call for
>>freeing buffers allocated with malloc(). Are any of this alternatives
>>implemented or on the roadmap? What workaround do you suggest?
>>
>
>We can do that, but it is not on my roadmap. Send my patches for it and
>I will review them.
The easiest way to do it (and to continue with the actual API without
modifications) would be to have a function call like:
void hci_str_free(char *str)
{
free(str);
}
So after a call to hci_dflagstostr() (for example), the resulting
pointer should be freed with hci_str_free(). In any case, there is one
exception: hci_dtypetostr(); it returns a pointer to static data.
Cheers,
Pedro
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2693 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-06 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-31 16:30 [Bluez-users] malloc & free Pedro Monjo Florit
2005-04-03 18:58 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-04-06 7:12 ` Pedro Monjo Florit [this message]
2005-04-06 7:33 ` Xavier Garreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42538BC5.7060106@futurlink.com \
--to=pedro.monjo@futurlink.com \
--cc=bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox