Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix two regression issues for QCA controllers

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 22/04/2024 12:05, quic_zijuhu wrote:
>>> 3) qca_serdev_shutdown() is serdev's shutdown and not hdev's shutdown()
>>> it should not and also never get chance to be invoked even if BT is
>>> disabled at above 2) step.  qca_serdev_shutdown() need to send the VSC
>>> to reset controller during warm reset phase of above 2) steps.
>>
>> Anyway, any explanation providing background how you are fixing this
>> issue while keeping *previous problem fixed* is useful but should be
>> provided in commit msg. I asked about this two or three times.
>>
>> BTW, provide here exact kernel version you tested this patches with.
>> Also the exact hardware.
>>
> there are almost no commit with tag Tested-by also provide exact kernel

?!?

So this was not tested at all by you on mainline kernel and you push
downstream patch? That's how shall we understand this?

> version. for one type bt controller. different h/w has different config.
> important is that this issue is fixed in reported H/W and don't cause
> issue for other issue.

Amount of pushback from your side and ignoring questions raised during
review is way too much.

> 
> let us stop here and wait for other comments.

So why do you push again in v5?

Best regards,
Krzysztof