Hi Jose, My spontaneous reaction would be; really? My code is based on the socket-abstraction in BlueZ and it works fine for multiple ACL connections, and the SCO-option is only a second socket-invocation on top of that...? Confusing... There has to be some way to solve this? Setting SCO packet type to HV1 allows for three simultaneous SCO connections AFAIK - so this should not be limited in BlueZ - and if it really is, then why and how do I work around that.... I mean, RF_COMM / ACL sockets work just fine... Regards, Markus Adolfsson Jose Vasconcellos skrev: > What you are seeing is normal. The current code only supports one > connection. > It would be better if the existing code simply would fail to open a second > connection to avoid a lot of confusion. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Bluez-devel mailing list > Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Markus Adolfsson* M.Sc.CE. Product Development Mail: markus.adolfsson@free2move.net Phone: +46 35 152268 Mobile: +46 707 165296 *Free2move AB* -- /WIRELESS MADE EASY/ Phone: +46 35 152260 Fax: +46 35 152269 Web: www.free2move.net Address: Sperlingsgatan 7 SE-30248 Halmstad Sweden