From: Fabien Chevalier <fabchevalier@free.fr>
To: BlueZ development <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] [PATCH] Bluez exceptions refactoring updated patch
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:01:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <474FD172.3090109@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1196196897.17196.56.camel@aeonflux>
Hi Marcel,
>
> and the origin is from the other error.[ch] files. So the copyright
> still prevails. Copying content from one file to another one doesn't
> change the copyright.
If this is the case i should have a couple of copyrights in the
pcm_bluetooth and ctl_bluetooth files, as if i remember well they both
started as a copy& past from plugz project ;-)
I will surely send a patch to fix that one of those days.
>
>>> It is great that you added comments for each function, but they belong
>>> inside the *.c files. The rule is that they should be placed where the
>>> actual function body is defined.
>> Marcel, i don't know where from you got this idea, but i find it pretty
>> dumb. The whole point in having the documentation in the header file is
>> that as a user of a function you're not interested in how it works (the
>> c file), but what it does, which is what the documentation is for.
>>
>> I don't know of *any* project that has it's function level documentation
>> in the C files.
>> But there are numerous counter-examples:
>> - The Linux Kernel (have a look at the USB stack file
>> include/linux/usb.h for instance).
>
> And check drivers/usb/core/urb.c for another example. The documentation
> comment are not for reading the *.h. They are for creating automated API
> documentation. The that structs are document in the header file is
> right, because they are defined there. The actual function are defined
> in the *.c files and thus the comment belongs there.
>
If you wish to follow kernel documenting style, then so be it. We're
clearly sitting in the minority side however ;-)
Cheers,
Fabien
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-30 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-25 21:32 [PATCH] Bluez exceptions refactoring updated patch Fabien Chevalier
2007-11-26 5:47 ` [Bluez-devel] " Marcel Holtmann
2007-11-26 16:12 ` Fabien Chevalier
2007-11-27 20:54 ` [Bluez-devel] " Marcel Holtmann
2007-11-30 9:01 ` Fabien Chevalier [this message]
2007-11-30 9:41 ` Marcel Holtmann
2007-11-26 14:12 ` Johan Hedberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=474FD172.3090109@free.fr \
--to=fabchevalier@free.fr \
--cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=johan.hedberg@nokia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).