Re: [Bluez-users] slave - slave talk in a piconet

bsd user
2008-01-03T13:10:54Z

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1239 bytes --]

So, B or C has no knowledge about each other when they are slaves of master
A, right? Then, can I say if B want to talk with C, they need higher level
protocol support, such as telnet, ftp. And, all data exchange will be
forwarded by Master A. right?

Thanks!

On Jan 3, 2008 9:07 AM, guoyun <guoyun@techfaith.cn> wrote:

> Hi, Brad
>
> > hey
> >
> > > If there is a piconet that has 2 slave B,C, the master is A. Does B
> > > know the existence of C? can B talk to C directly without
> > A(master)'s intervention?
> >
> > if they did talk to each other directly, one would have to be
> > master and you'd have a scatternet.
>
> one bluetooth could be in two or more piconet, but it just can play as
> slave _not_ master for the bluetooth clock.
>
> Please refer to Core SPEC. chapter 4.1. Piconet topology.
>
> BRs
> Yun
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Bluez-users mailing list
> Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users
>
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1809 bytes --]