public inbox for linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@hartkopp.net>
To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: possible recursive locking in 2.6.30-rc6
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 15:29:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A1A9D1D.2050301@hartkopp.net> (raw)

Hi all,

i'm sometimes working with BT DUN with a Nokia 6210 Navigator.

Last weekend anything must gone wrong, so my mobile was not able to create a
ppp link with DUN this morning. After updating the driver and BT-chip firmware
of my Dell 830 laptop and several pairing attempts i was able to kick it to
work again ... :-]

And i needed to move the channel from '5' to '3' in /etc/bluetooth/rfcomm.conf
- i assume the Nokia Windows Software re-configured this in the process of
re-installing their SW when updating the Windows drivers ... don't know.

In the meantime (when the paring or anything else was broken) i discovered
this kernel message about a locking issue.

Is this a known problem?

Regards,
Oliver

ps. Please CC me as i did not subcribe the list. Tnx

=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.30-rc6-02911-gbb803cf #16
---------------------------------------------
bluetooth/2518 is trying to acquire lock:
 (bluetooth){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0130c14>] flush_work+0x28/0xb0

but task is already holding lock:
 (bluetooth){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0130424>] worker_thread+0x149/0x25e

other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by bluetooth/2518:
 #0:  (bluetooth){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0130424>] worker_thread+0x149/0x25e
 #1:  (&conn->work_del){+.+...}, at: [<c0130424>] worker_thread+0x149/0x25e

stack backtrace:
Pid: 2518, comm: bluetooth Not tainted 2.6.30-rc6-02911-gbb803cf #16
Call Trace:
 [<c03d64d9>] ? printk+0xf/0x11
 [<c0140d96>] __lock_acquire+0x7ce/0xb1b
 [<c0141173>] lock_acquire+0x90/0xad
 [<c0130c14>] ? flush_work+0x28/0xb0
 [<c0130c2e>] flush_work+0x42/0xb0
 [<c0130c14>] ? flush_work+0x28/0xb0
 [<f8b84966>] del_conn+0x1c/0x84 [bluetooth]
 [<c0130469>] worker_thread+0x18e/0x25e
 [<c0130424>] ? worker_thread+0x149/0x25e
 [<f8b8494a>] ? del_conn+0x0/0x84 [bluetooth]
 [<c0133843>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x33
 [<c01302db>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x25e
 [<c013355a>] kthread+0x45/0x6b
 [<c0133515>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6b
 [<c01034a7>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10

             reply	other threads:[~2009-05-25 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-25 13:29 Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
2009-05-25 19:55 ` possible recursive locking in 2.6.30-rc6 Oliver Hartkopp
2009-05-26  8:19   ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-05-27  1:13     ` Dave Young
2009-05-27  5:52       ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-05-27  6:27         ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-05-27  7:42       ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-05-27 11:11         ` Dave Young
2009-05-27 11:17           ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-05-28  0:42             ` Dave Young

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A1A9D1D.2050301@hartkopp.net \
    --to=oliver@hartkopp.net \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox