public inbox for linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@hartkopp.net>
To: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tty_register_device NULL pointer dereference in 2.6.31-rc4
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:39:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A6D91D7.6030204@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A6D8BA3.3030601@hartkopp.net>

Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> Dave Young wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 01:10:46PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>>>>> tty_register_device appears to have been called with a NULL pointer. Not
>>>>> sure why however.
>>>> if that is the pointer for the struct device, then that used to be fine
>>>> in the past. Not all RFCOMM device have a parent when they are created.
>>> The tty layer doesn't care about the struct device really. Nothing there
>>> has changed. The NULL passed appears to be the driver argument.
>> Agree with you, because in rfcomm_init, rfcomm thread run before tty initilized, the following patch may fix the problem.
>> oliver, could you verify it it fix your problem?
> 
> Hi Dave,
> 
> i get this problem really seldom on my Laptop and i did not manage to get a
> reproducible Oops of that problem.
> 
> Anyway the code you are pointing to seems to have a problem and your added
> error handling looks good to me - even if i don't know if the initializations
> can be reordered in that way.
> 
> I'll try your patch, but it could take a *long* time to prove it right ;-)
> 

Just FYI:

Your patch compiled, the system booted without problems and nothing is broken
so far. I checked the BT, WLAN and BT dial-up with success. So it looks good
to me.

Regards,
Oliver

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-27 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-25 10:01 tty_register_device NULL pointer dereference in 2.6.31-rc4 Oliver Hartkopp
2009-07-25 10:50 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-25 11:07   ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-07-25 12:10     ` Alan Cox
2009-07-27  9:59       ` Dave Young
2009-07-27 11:12         ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-07-27 11:39           ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
2009-07-27 14:07             ` Dave Young
2009-07-29 14:00               ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-07-30  9:15                 ` Dave Young
2009-07-30 10:05                   ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-07-31  9:39                     ` Dave Young
2009-07-31 10:10                       ` Dave Young
2009-07-31 11:20                         ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-08-01  3:17                           ` Dave Young
2009-08-01  9:15                             ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-08-01  9:21                             ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-08-01  9:32                               ` Dave Young
2009-08-03 12:03                                 ` Oliver Hartkopp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A6D91D7.6030204@hartkopp.net \
    --to=oliver@hartkopp.net \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox