From: Zhenhua Zhang <zhenhua.zhang@intel.com>
To: "ofono@ofono.org" <ofono@ofono.org>,
"João Paulo Rechi Vita" <jprvita@gmail.com>
Cc: "pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de"
<pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de>,
"Zheng, Huan" <huan.zheng@intel.com>,
"linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/2] HFP AG integration with PulseAudio
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:38:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B678217.6050003@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa32413d1002010909h1ba06e13n1511d56903406945@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jprvita,
On 02/02/2010 01:09 AM, João Paulo Rechi Vita wrote:
> 2010/1/29 João Paulo Rechi Vita<jprvita@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to add support for the Handsfree Gateway role Gustavo just added
>> to BlueZ and oFono. The BlueZ patches can be found on [1] and [2] and the
>> oFono part was just merged upstream.
>>
>> But when it comes to integrate them with Pulse, I'm getting a POLLHUP when
>> trying to write on the fd. Also, it seems different gateways have different
>> behaviours regarding when they connect the SCO link. Some phone connect
>> them just after the RFCOMM link (some Nokia phones), when there is no call
>> going on yet, and others just when a call is started (Android 1.5).
>>
>> Also, right now the same property (State) is beeing used to refer when the
>> RFCOOM link is established (State=Connected) and when the SCO link is
>> established (State=Playing). Shouldn't this be handled by separate props?
>>
>> And last but not least, is the new Media API intended to handle the audio
>> part of handsfree gateways too? If so, maybe we should use all this work
>> as a prototype for latter integration with the new API.
>>
>> Any help on testing and getting this working together or comments on the
>> topic would be appreciated.
>>
>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bluetooth/msg04250.html
>> [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bluetooth/msg04251.html
>>
>> --
>> João Paulo Rechi Vita
>> http://jprvita.wordpress.com/
>>
>>
>>
> Just updating, this patch actually worked when testing with a
> different adapter (Fujitsu-Siemens CSR-based). The adapter causing
> problems was a Broadcom 2.1, the internal adapter of a Dell Mini10.
> Also, suspending the source / sink actually doesn't interfere.
>
> I did a small video of the whole stuff: http://www.vimeo.com/907879
>
Good work! Looks like it works pretty fine. :-). At the last of video, I
saw you load loopback module manually. Zheng Huan made a patch to load
loopback automatically. I believe Padovan has a copy of that. You may
also integrate it with upstream.
> There are still some problems when testing against Nokia N900 and
> 2660. After the "enable-modem" step, the RFCOMM link is connected and
> the SCO just after that, leading module-bluetooth-discover to load
> module-bluetooth-device. Sometimes after that the polling on the
> stream fd get a POLLHUP and the module-bluetooth-device unloads
> itself. Other times the POLLHUP doesn't happen and the remaining steps
> go without any problem.
>
> Ideas on how to improve this scenario will be very helpful.
>
>
AFAK, the SCO connection request is from AG side and BlueZ will check if
no SCO stream comes from AG(??), it will shutdown the connection. In my
memory, I don't get POLLHUP event in my original patch. You can turn on
debug flag to see more BlueZ output.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-02 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-29 14:44 [RFC] [PATCH 0/2] HFP AG integration with PulseAudio João Paulo Rechi Vita
2010-01-29 14:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] bluetooth: improve dbus logging a little bit João Paulo Rechi Vita
2010-01-29 14:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] bluetooth: add HFP Gateway support João Paulo Rechi Vita
2010-01-29 14:53 ` [RFC] [PATCH 0/2] HFP AG integration with PulseAudio João Paulo Rechi Vita
[not found] ` <20100202111019.GA27346@tango.0pointer.de>
2010-02-03 18:38 ` [pulseaudio-discuss] " João Paulo Rechi Vita
2010-02-01 17:09 ` João Paulo Rechi Vita
2010-02-02 1:38 ` Zhenhua Zhang [this message]
2010-02-02 3:50 ` Zhenhua Zhang
2010-02-03 18:30 ` João Paulo Rechi Vita
2010-02-04 3:21 ` Zhenhua Zhang
2010-02-02 17:03 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B678217.6050003@intel.com \
--to=zhenhua.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=huan.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=jprvita@gmail.com \
--cc=lennart@poettering.net \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
--cc=pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).