From: Suraj Sumangala <suraj@atheros.com>
To: Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com>
Cc: Suraj Sumangala <Suraj.Sumangala@Atheros.com>,
"linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
"marcel@holtmann.org" <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Jothikumar Mothilal <Jothikumar.Mothilal@Atheros.com>,
"gfpadovan@gmail.com" <gfpadovan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Added support for Atheros AR300x Bluetooth Chip
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:51:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BCE7D45.1080209@atheros.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100420173428.GA2559@tux>
Hi Luis,
Luis Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 03:20:32AM -0700, Suraj Sumangala wrote:
>> This protocol implements support for power management feature provided by AR300x chip.
>> This lets the controller chip go to sleep mode if there is no Bluetooth
>> activity for some time.
>> It then wakes up the chip in case of a Bluetooth activity.
>
> The above commit log needs some more work. Try to keep the
> commit log entry subject to about 50 characters, the context should
> not pass around 75 characters. Your commit also indicates this is a
> "protocol" ? This is driver, and you do have some hacks for enhancing
> power saving, but that is not that relevant to the commit log.
>
> How about:
>
> ---
> Add support for the Atheros AR300x Bluetooth Chip
>
> This adds support for the Atheros Bluetooth serial protocol to
> support the AR300x chipsets. The serial protocol implements
> enhanced power management features for the AR300x chipsets.
>
> Reviewed-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj <suraj@atheros.com>
> ---
>
> Of course you will need to adjust the subject and prepend it with
> PATCH v4, just as you did with a v3 for this patch.
>
> Then, this stuff:
>
>> * Third version
>>
>> ** Updated with extra spacing and indentation
>
> Do you use checkpatch.pl for your patches? If not please
> add check your patches after committing them with:
>
> git show ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -
> vi drivers/bluetooth/hci_ath.c
> git commit -a --amend
>
> And repeat until checkpatch.pl is git happy :)
Yes, I had done a checkpatch round with the patch. it looked happy. Did
you see any issue that could should have been caught by it?
>
>> ** made function definitions static
>> ** Removed inline and register keyword usage.
>> ** Removed unused return calls.
>> ** Incorporated code comments by Luis and Gustavo
>>
>> Thanks Luis and Gustavo for your comments
>
>
> Remove it from the commit log, if you do want to add some extra text
> to the patch youc an put it below the three dashes ("-") where the
> diff stat goes:
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suraj <suraj@atheros.com>
>>
>> ---
> ^^^
>
> These are the three lines, anything below is ignored by git am
> when the maintainer applies the patch. So you can add anything you
> want ignored by git am here.
>
>> drivers/bluetooth/Kconfig | 11 ++
>> drivers/bluetooth/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/bluetooth/hci_ath.c | 384 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c | 6 +
>> drivers/bluetooth/hci_uart.h | 8 +-
>> 5 files changed, 409 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100755 drivers/bluetooth/hci_ath.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/Kconfig b/drivers/bluetooth/Kconfig
>> index 058fbcc..81abeff 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/Kconfig
>> @@ -58,6 +58,17 @@ config BT_HCIUART_BCSP
>>
>> Say Y here to compile support for HCI BCSP protocol.
>>
>> +config BT_HCIUART_ATH
>> + bool "Atheros AR300x Board support"
>> + depends on BT_HCIUART
>> + help
>> + HCIATH (HCI Atheros) is a serial protocol for communication
>> + between Bluetooth device and host with support for Atheros AR300x
>> + power management feature. This protocol is required for
>> + serial Bluetooth devices that are based on Atheros AR300x chips.
>
> Please adjust the description as well. How about:
>
> + HCIATH (HCI Atheros) is a serial protocol for communication
> + between the host and Atheros AR300x Bluetooth devices. The
> + protocol implements enhaned power management features for the
> + the AR300x chipsets, it lets the controller chip go to sleep
> + mode if there is no Bluetooth activity for some time and wakes
> + up the chip in case of a Bluetooth activity. Enabling this
> + option will build HCI Atheros support into the hci_uart driver.
> + Enable this option if you have an UART Atheros AR300x serial
> + device.
>
>
>> +
>> + Say Y here to compile support for HCIATH protocol.
>> +
>> config BT_HCIUART_LL
>> bool "HCILL protocol support"
>> depends on BT_HCIUART
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/Makefile b/drivers/bluetooth/Makefile
>> index 7e5aed5..1481faa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/Makefile
>> @@ -26,4 +26,5 @@ hci_uart-y := hci_ldisc.o
>> hci_uart-$(CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_H4) += hci_h4.o
>> hci_uart-$(CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_BCSP) += hci_bcsp.o
>> hci_uart-$(CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_LL) += hci_ll.o
>> +hci_uart-$(CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_ATH) += hci_ath.o
>> hci_uart-objs := $(hci_uart-y)
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ath.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ath.c
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 0000000..2f91954
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ath.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,384 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2009-2010 Atheros Communications Inc.
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
>> + * (at your option) any later version.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + *
>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
>> + * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
>> + *
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +
>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/tty.h>
>> +#include <linux/errno.h>
>> +#include <linux/ioctl.h>
>> +#include <linux/skbuff.h>
>> +
>> +#include <net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h>
>> +#include <net/bluetooth/hci_core.h>
>> +
>> +#include "hci_uart.h"
>> +
>> +
>> +/* HCIATH receiver States */
>> +#define HCIATH_W4_PACKET_TYPE 0
>> +#define HCIATH_W4_EVENT_HDR 1
>> +#define HCIATH_W4_ACL_HDR 2
>> +#define HCIATH_W4_SCO_HDR 3
>> +#define HCIATH_W4_DATA 4
>> +
>> +struct ath_struct {
>> + struct hci_uart *hu;
>> + unsigned int rx_state;
>> + unsigned int rx_count;
>> + unsigned int cur_sleep;
>> +
>> + spinlock_t hciath_lock;
>> + struct sk_buff *rx_skb;
>> + struct sk_buff_head txq;
>> + wait_queue_head_t wqevt;
>> + struct work_struct ctxtsw;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int ath_wakeup_ar3001(struct tty_struct *tty)
>> +{
>> + struct termios settings;
>> + int status = 0x00;
>> +
>> + status = tty->driver->ops->tiocmget(tty, NULL);
>> +
>> + if ((status & TIOCM_CTS))
>> + return status;
>
> No need for double () parens here. This should be fine:
>
> + if (status & TIOCM_CTS)
> + return status;
>
> You would use double parens if you are doing a check against
> another flag as well.
>
>> +
>> + n_tty_ioctl_helper(tty, NULL, TCGETS, (unsigned long)&settings);
>> +
>> + /* Disable Automatic RTSCTS */
>> + settings.c_cflag &= ~CRTSCTS;
>> + n_tty_ioctl_helper(tty, NULL, TCSETS, (unsigned long)&settings);
>> +
>> + status = tty->driver->ops->tiocmget(tty, NULL);
>> +
>> + /* Clear RTS first */
>> + tty->driver->ops->tiocmset(tty, NULL, 0x00, TIOCM_RTS);
>> + mdelay(20);
>> +
>> + status = tty->driver->ops->tiocmget(tty, NULL);
>> +
>> + /* Set RTS, wake up board */
>> + tty->driver->ops->tiocmset(tty, NULL, TIOCM_RTS, 0x00);
>> + mdelay(20);
>> +
>> + status = tty->driver->ops->tiocmget(tty, NULL);
>> +
>> + n_tty_ioctl_helper(tty, NULL, TCGETS, (unsigned long)&settings);
>> +
>> + settings.c_cflag |= CRTSCTS;
>> + n_tty_ioctl_helper(tty, NULL, TCSETS, (unsigned long)&settings);
>> +
>> + return status;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void ath_context_switch(struct work_struct *work)
>
> Can you please rename this to ath_hci_uart_work()
>
>> +{
>> + int status;
>> + struct ath_struct *ath;
>> + struct hci_uart *hu;
>> + struct tty_struct *tty;
>> +
>> + ath = container_of(work, struct ath_struct, ctxtsw);
>> +
>> + hu = ath->hu;
>> + tty = hu->tty;
>> +
>> + /* verify and wake up controller */
>> + if (ath->cur_sleep) {
>> +
>> + status = ath_wakeup_ar3001(tty);
>> +
>> + if (!(status & TIOCM_CTS))
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Ready to send Data */
>> + clear_bit(HCI_UART_SENDING, &hu->tx_state);
>> + hci_uart_tx_wakeup(hu);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Initialize protocol */
>> +static int ath_open(struct hci_uart *hu)
>> +{
>> + struct ath_struct *ath;
>> +
>> + BT_DBG("hu %p", hu);
>> +
>> + ath = kzalloc(sizeof(*ath), GFP_ATOMIC);
>> + if (!ath)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + skb_queue_head_init(&ath->txq);
>> + spin_lock_init(&ath->hciath_lock);
>> +
>> + hu->priv = ath;
>> + ath->hu = hu;
>> +
>> + init_waitqueue_head(&ath->wqevt);
>> + INIT_WORK(&ath->ctxtsw, ath_context_switch);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Flush protocol data */
>> +static int ath_flush(struct hci_uart *hu)
>> +{
>> + struct ath_struct *ath = hu->priv;
>> +
>> + BT_DBG("hu %p", hu);
>> +
>> + skb_queue_purge(&ath->txq);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Close protocol */
>> +static int ath_close(struct hci_uart *hu)
>> +{
>> + struct ath_struct *ath = hu->priv;
>> +
>> + BT_DBG("hu %p", hu);
>> +
>> + skb_queue_purge(&ath->txq);
>> +
>> + if (ath->rx_skb)
>> + kfree_skb(ath->rx_skb);
>
> No need for the check, kfree_skb() does that for you
> and it has it optimized for the case where the skb you
> pass is NULL. You can just do:
>
> + kfree_skb(ath->rx_skb);
>
>> +
>> + cancel_work_sync(&ath->ctxtsw);
>> +
>> + hu->priv = NULL;
>> + kfree(ath);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> Did you give this new patch a spin by looping bringing up,
> scanning, bringing the interface down? Or have a loop doing
> a scan while in another window you bring the interface up
> and down?
>
Yep, Have been testing it for sometime. Haven't seen any issue yet (Hope
I dont see any :-) )
>> +
>> +/* Enqueue frame for transmittion */
>> +static int ath_enqueue(struct hci_uart *hu, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> +{
>> + struct ath_struct *ath = hu->priv;
>> +
>> + if (bt_cb(skb)->pkt_type == HCI_SCODATA_PKT) {
>> +
>> + /* Discard SCO packet.AR3001 does not support SCO over HCI */
>
> Add a space after packet. Why does it not support SCO over HCI BTW?
> Just curious. I'm new to BT :) Is this common? If this is common can't
> the BT stack be informed of these things so that they don't pass the skbs
> to the driver?
>
From my experience, it is common for smaller BT devices (headsets) and
devices with memory limitations.
I guess, there is no way to tell SCO routing using any HCI cmd/Event.
In the Linux Ubuntu distro that I use, it is controlled using the
"SCORouting" flag in "/etc/bluetooth/audio.conf". Since it is a user
configuration, driver can not assume that the flag will be set.
So, this is like a precautionary check.
> This could be done in a separate patch though if this is the case
> though.
>
>> + BT_DBG("SCO Packet over HCI received Dropping");
>> +
>> + kfree(skb);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + BT_DBG("hu %p skb %p", hu, skb);
>> +
>> + /* Prepend skb with frame type */
>> + memcpy(skb_push(skb, 1), &bt_cb(skb)->pkt_type, 1);
>> +
>> + skb_queue_tail(&ath->txq, skb);
>> + set_bit(HCI_UART_SENDING, &hu->tx_state);
>> +
>> + schedule_work(&ath->ctxtsw);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct sk_buff *ath_dequeue(struct hci_uart *hu)
>> +{
>> + struct ath_struct *ath = hu->priv;
>> + struct sk_buff *skbuf;
>> +
>> + skbuf = skb_dequeue(&ath->txq);
>> +
>> + if (!skbuf)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Check if the HCI command is HCI sleep enable and
>> + * update the sleep enable flag with command parameter.
>> + *
>> + * Value of sleep enable flag will be used later
>> + * to verify if controller has to be woken up before
>> + * sending any packet.
>> + */
>> + if (skbuf->data[0] == 0x01 && skbuf->data[1] == 0x04 &&
>> + skbuf->data[2] == 0xFC)
>> + ath->cur_sleep = skbuf->data[4];
>
> Might as well just do this:
>
> + if (skbuf->data[0] == 0x01 &&
> + skbuf->data[1] == 0x04 &&
> + skbuf->data[2] == 0xFC)
> + ath->cur_sleep = skbuf->data[4];
>
> Is this sort of check done in any other drivers/protocols? If so a
> helper could be added to hci_uart.h if this is the case, but likely
> better though a separate patch.
No, this check is done only for this specific driver/protocol.
This is the reason why we had to go for board specific driver change.
Otherways, we could have used the default HCI driver implementation.
>
>> +
>> + return skbuf;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void ath_check_data_len(struct ath_struct *ath, int len)
>> +{
>> + int room = skb_tailroom(ath->rx_skb);
>> +
>> + BT_DBG("len %d room %d", len, room);
>> +
>> + if (len > room) {
>> + BT_ERR("Data length is too large");
>> + kfree_skb(ath->rx_skb);
>> + ath->rx_state = HCIATH_W4_PACKET_TYPE;
>> + ath->rx_skb = NULL;
>> + ath->rx_count = 0;
>> + } else {
>> + ath->rx_state = HCIATH_W4_DATA;
>> + ath->rx_count = len;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Recv data */
>> +static int ath_recv(struct hci_uart *hu, void *data, int count)
>> +{
>> + struct ath_struct *ath = hu->priv;
>> + char *ptr = data;
>> + struct hci_event_hdr *eh;
>> + struct hci_acl_hdr *ah;
>> + struct hci_sco_hdr *sh;
>> + int len, type, dlen;
>> +
>> +
>> + BT_DBG("hu %p count %d rx_state %d rx_count %d", hu, count,
>> + ath->rx_state, ath->rx_count);
>> +
>> + while (count) {
>> + if (ath->rx_count) {
>> +
>> + len = min_t(unsigned int, ath->rx_count, count);
>> + memcpy(skb_put(ath->rx_skb, len), ptr, len);
>> + ath->rx_count -= len;
>> + count -= len;
>> + ptr += len;
>> +
>> + if (ath->rx_count)
>> + continue;
>> + switch (ath->rx_state) {
>> + case HCIATH_W4_DATA:
>> + hci_recv_frame(ath->rx_skb);
>> + ath->rx_state = HCIATH_W4_PACKET_TYPE;
>> + ath->rx_skb = NULL;
>> + ath->rx_count = 0;
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + case HCIATH_W4_EVENT_HDR:
>> + eh = (struct hci_event_hdr *)ath->rx_skb->data;
>> +
>> + BT_DBG("Event header: evt 0x%2.2x plen %d",
>> + eh->evt, eh->plen);
>> +
>> + ath_check_data_len(ath, eh->plen);
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + case HCIATH_W4_ACL_HDR:
>> + ah = (struct hci_acl_hdr *)ath->rx_skb->data;
>> + dlen = __le16_to_cpu(ah->dlen);
>> +
>> + BT_DBG("ACL header: dlen %d", dlen);
>> +
>> + ath_check_data_len(ath, dlen);
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + case HCIATH_W4_SCO_HDR:
>> + sh = (struct hci_sco_hdr *)ath->rx_skb->data;
>> +
>> + BT_DBG("SCO header: dlen %d", sh->dlen);
>> +
>> + ath_check_data_len(ath, sh->dlen);
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* HCIATH_W4_PACKET_TYPE */
>> + switch (*ptr) {
>> + case HCI_EVENT_PKT:
>> + BT_DBG("Event packet");
>> + ath->rx_state = HCIATH_W4_EVENT_HDR;
>> + ath->rx_count = HCI_EVENT_HDR_SIZE;
>> + type = HCI_EVENT_PKT;
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case HCI_ACLDATA_PKT:
>> + BT_DBG("ACL packet");
>> + ath->rx_state = HCIATH_W4_ACL_HDR;
>> + ath->rx_count = HCI_ACL_HDR_SIZE;
>> + type = HCI_ACLDATA_PKT;
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case HCI_SCODATA_PKT:
>> + BT_DBG("SCO packet");
>> + ath->rx_state = HCIATH_W4_SCO_HDR;
>> + ath->rx_count = HCI_SCO_HDR_SIZE;
>> + type = HCI_SCODATA_PKT;
>> + break;
>> +
>> + default:
>> + BT_ERR("Unknown HCI packet type %2.2x", (__u8) *ptr);
>> + hu->hdev->stat.err_rx++;
>> + ptr++;
>> + count--;
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + };
>> + ptr++;
>> + count--;
>> +
>> + /* Allocate packet */
>> + ath->rx_skb = bt_skb_alloc(HCI_MAX_FRAME_SIZE, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> + if (!ath->rx_skb) {
>> + BT_ERR("Can't allocate mem for new packet");
>> + ath->rx_state = HCIATH_W4_PACKET_TYPE;
>> + ath->rx_count = 0;
>> +
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> + ath->rx_skb->dev = (void *)hu->hdev;
>> + bt_cb(ath->rx_skb)->pkt_type = type;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return count;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct hci_uart_proto athp = {
>> + .id = HCI_UART_ATH,
>> + .open = ath_open,
>> + .close = ath_close,
>> + .recv = ath_recv,
>> + .enqueue = ath_enqueue,
>> + .dequeue = ath_dequeue,
>> + .flush = ath_flush,
>> +};
>> +
>> +int ath_init(void)
>> +{
>> + int err = hci_uart_register_proto(&athp);
>> +
>> + if (!err)
>> + BT_INFO("HCIATH protocol initialized");
>> + else
>> + BT_ERR("HCIATH protocol registration failed");
>> +
>> + return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int ath_deinit(void)
>> +{
>> + return hci_uart_unregister_proto(&athp);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c
>> index 76a1abb..7dd76d1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c
>> @@ -542,6 +542,9 @@ static int __init hci_uart_init(void)
>> #ifdef CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_LL
>> ll_init();
>> #endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_ATH
>> + ath_init();
>> +#endif
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -559,6 +562,9 @@ static void __exit hci_uart_exit(void)
>> #ifdef CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_LL
>> ll_deinit();
>> #endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_ATH
>> + ath_deinit();
>> +#endif
>>
>> /* Release tty registration of line discipline */
>> if ((err = tty_unregister_ldisc(N_HCI)))
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_uart.h b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_uart.h
>> index 50113db..385537f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_uart.h
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_uart.h
>> @@ -33,13 +33,14 @@
>> #define HCIUARTGETDEVICE _IOR('U', 202, int)
>>
>> /* UART protocols */
>> -#define HCI_UART_MAX_PROTO 5
>> +#define HCI_UART_MAX_PROTO 6
>>
>> #define HCI_UART_H4 0
>> #define HCI_UART_BCSP 1
>> #define HCI_UART_3WIRE 2
>> #define HCI_UART_H4DS 3
>> #define HCI_UART_LL 4
>> +#define HCI_UART_ATH 5
>>
>> struct hci_uart;
>>
>> @@ -91,3 +92,8 @@ int bcsp_deinit(void);
>> int ll_init(void);
>> int ll_deinit(void);
>> #endif
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_ATH
>> +int ath_init(void);
>> +int ath_deinit(void);
>> +#endif
>> --
>> 1.7.0
>>
>>
>>
Thanks for the comments.
Regards,
Suraj
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-21 4:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-15 5:01 [PATCH] Added support for Atheros AR300x Bluetooth Chip suraj
2010-03-24 5:27 ` suraj
2010-03-29 9:01 ` suraj
[not found] ` <1271673889.19858.4.camel@atheros013-desktop>
2010-04-19 18:11 ` Support " Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-03-31 10:59 ` [PATCH] Added Host level support for Atheros AR3xxx " suraj
2010-04-19 23:53 ` [PATCH] Added support for Atheros AR300x " Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-04-20 10:20 ` [PATCH v3] " suraj
2010-04-20 15:36 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-04-20 17:34 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-04-21 4:21 ` Suraj Sumangala [this message]
2010-04-21 10:22 ` [PATCH v4] Add support for the " suraj
2010-04-21 17:30 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-04-22 6:10 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-04-22 6:54 ` Suraj Sumangala
2010-04-22 8:59 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2010-04-22 9:10 ` [PATCH v5] " suraj
2010-04-26 11:00 ` suraj
2010-04-27 6:19 ` [PATCH] New Firmware for Atheros bluetooth chipset AR3011 suraj
2010-04-27 8:28 ` [PATCH] patch to request new firmware for AR3011 Chip suraj
2010-04-27 15:55 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-05-11 9:04 ` [PATCH v2] ath3k: add support for new firmware suraj
2010-05-05 12:33 ` [PATCH v5] Add support for the Atheros AR300x Bluetooth Chip suraj
2010-05-06 7:45 ` buffer starvation with multiple ACL link suraj
2010-05-20 16:02 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-05-10 20:12 ` [PATCH v5] Add support for the Atheros AR300x Bluetooth Chip Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-05-11 8:29 ` suraj
2010-05-18 11:39 ` suraj
2010-05-12 13:47 ` [PATCH v3] hciattach application support for " suraj
2010-05-20 13:37 ` suraj
2010-05-20 16:00 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-05-21 5:01 ` Suraj Sumangala
2010-05-21 7:34 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-05-20 16:09 ` [PATCH v5] Add support for the " Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BCE7D45.1080209@atheros.com \
--to=suraj@atheros.com \
--cc=Jothikumar.Mothilal@Atheros.com \
--cc=Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com \
--cc=Suraj.Sumangala@Atheros.com \
--cc=gfpadovan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).