From: Suraj <suraj@Atheros.com>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: Suraj Sumangala <Suraj.Sumangala@Atheros.com>,
"linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
Jothikumar Mothilal <Jothikumar.Mothilal@Atheros.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] Bluetooth: Provide access to reassembled Rx packets
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:18:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C4E650D.4080806@Atheros.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1280184169.2621.63.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Hi Marcel,
On 7/27/2010 4:12 AM, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> So first of all, lets make something perfectly clear. All Bluetooth
> drivers are _transport_ drivers. They don't need to know what they are
> transporting. And in addition you should not look into the packets that
> you are sending or receiving. The Bluetooth core does that HCI packet
> parsing.
>
> This is how I want it and how this is going to stay. Everything else is
> an insane approach and cost every single driver overhead. In addition
> the lifetime rules of SKBs become more and more complicated. That is a
> pretty bad thing. It will result in excessive memory usage and will
> cause problems.
I understand the point that you are making. But If I am not mistaken,
HCI transport driver is the only part of the system that could be vendor
specific ( HCI ATH3K, HCI LL etc). So a vendor specific command or event
makes more sense to a transport driver than anybody else.
Is there anyway this requirement can be sufficed without causing the
issues you have mentioned above?
>
> Regards
>
> Marcel
>
>
Regards
Suraj
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-27 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-26 6:34 [RFC v2] Bluetooth: Provide access to reassembled Rx packets Suraj Sumangala
2010-07-26 15:13 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-07-26 18:23 ` Suraj
2010-07-26 22:42 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-07-27 2:23 ` Suraj
2010-07-27 4:48 ` Suraj [this message]
2010-07-27 5:14 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-07-27 15:36 ` Suraj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C4E650D.4080806@Atheros.com \
--to=suraj@atheros.com \
--cc=Jothikumar.Mothilal@Atheros.com \
--cc=Suraj.Sumangala@Atheros.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox