From: Santiago Carot-Nemesio <sancane@gmail.com>
To: "Elvis Pfützenreuter" <epx@epx.com.br>
Cc: johan.hedberg@gmail.com, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CSP implementation for MCAP
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:03:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C80ABE8.9080309@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A11989E-5448-43B7-887F-217C54977E22@epx.com.br>
Hi Elvis,
On 09/02/10 20:58, Elvis Pfützenreuter wrote:
> This is the repository for the CSP implementation, rebased over the recently accepted MCAP, for your appreciation:
>
> git://gitorious.org/bluez-epx/bluez-epx.git csp
>
I have been divin in CSP code and at first look I found some issues that
I would like discuss with you.
The call to function mcap_sync_stop(mcl) it's only neccesary in static
close_mcl function. You can remove the second call in line 799 when user
closes explicitly the mcl due that first sync_stop will be called from
watcher set in control channel when its socket is closed.
Second thing is related to code structure. Because standard op codes and
close synchronization protocol have separate logic, it may better put
csp parameters away from mcl in a separate structure to avoid mess all
protocol logic in a big mcl structure, I was thinking in something like
this:
struct mcap_mcl {
/* Op code parameters */
....
struct mcap_csp *csp;
}
struct mcap_csp {
uint64_t base_tmstamp;
struct timespec base_time;
guint local_caps;
guint remote_caps;
guint rem_req_acc;
guint ind_expected;
MCAPCtrl csp_req;
guint ind_timer;
guint set_timer;
void *set_data;
gint dev_id;
gint dev_hci_fd;
void *csp_priv_data;
};
Because CSP is optional we can reserve memory for csp only when we will
use Clock Synchronization protocol.
Of course, I know that it depends on invidivual taste, but I would like
to comment this issue.
Comments are welcome.
Regards.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-03 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-02 18:58 CSP implementation for MCAP Elvis Pfützenreuter
2010-09-02 20:28 ` Johan Hedberg
2010-09-02 20:36 ` Elvis Pfützenreuter
2010-09-02 20:40 ` Johan Hedberg
2010-09-02 21:49 ` Elvis Pfützenreuter
2010-09-03 8:03 ` Santiago Carot-Nemesio [this message]
2010-09-03 12:53 ` Elvis Pfützenreuter
2010-09-15 22:45 ` Elvis Pfützenreuter
2010-09-16 12:39 ` Johan Hedberg
2010-09-16 12:55 ` José Antonio Santos Cadenas
2010-09-16 14:14 ` Elvis Pfützenreuter
2010-09-16 15:03 ` Johan Hedberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C80ABE8.9080309@gmail.com \
--to=sancane@gmail.com \
--cc=epx@epx.com.br \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).