* Re: 2.6.36-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.35
2010-10-04 18:35 ` 2.6.36-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.35 Luis R. Rodriguez
@ 2010-10-04 18:44 ` Dominik Brodowski
2010-10-04 18:57 ` Justin P. Mattock
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dominik Brodowski @ 2010-10-04 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luis R. Rodriguez
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-wireless, linux-bluetooth, justinmattock,
Bob Copeland, Pavel Machek
Hey,
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 11:35:25AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17061
> > Subject : 2.6.36-rc1 on zaurus: bluetooth regression
> > Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> > Date : 2010-08-21 15:24 (44 days old)
> > Message-ID : <20100821152445.GA1536@ucw.cz>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128240433828087&w=2
>
> I see no updates to this since August. There are boat load of PCMCIA
> changes recently, is bisect possible here?
Pavel already verified the PCMCIA-bigdiff since 2.6.35 does work, so it is
_not_ a PCMCIA issue.
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org/msg03460.html
Best,
Dominik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.36-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.35
2010-10-04 18:35 ` 2.6.36-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.35 Luis R. Rodriguez
2010-10-04 18:44 ` Dominik Brodowski
@ 2010-10-04 18:57 ` Justin P. Mattock
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-10-04 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luis R. Rodriguez
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-wireless, linux-bluetooth, Bob Copeland,
Pavel Machek, linux
On 10/04/2010 11:35 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Below are the 802.11 and Bluetooth ones:
>
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>> Unresolved regressions
>> ----------------------
>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19392
>> Subject : WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c:3475 ath5k_bss_info_changed+0x44/0x168 [ath5k]()
>> Submitter : Justin Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com>
>> Date : 2010-09-28 22:30 (6 days old)
>> Message-ID :<AANLkTim5WCGKPvEkOkO_YnMF9pg8mvLfQoFBNUFpfa_k@mail.gmail.com>
>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128571307018635&w=2
>
> WTF -- this ended up in a bisect pointing to some PCMCIA patch! Justin:
>
> * does this happen with wireless-testing.git ?
no this is the current Linus tree(have not tried any other tree).
as for the unresolved regression, this just was filed a few days ago..
> * Did you do the bisect on the entire kernel? What git tree are you
> using to bisect?
>
the bisect had to be between 2.6.34 and 2.6.32 due to pcmcia breaking
after 2.6.34(there is a bug report for that, but got resolved)
> Did you simply bring up the interface and then suspsend? Did you not
> add a new interface in between this? ath5k's add_interace has:
>
> if (sc->vif) {
> ret = 0;
> goto end;
> }
>
> But why does it just allow this to go through without complaining if
> multiple vifs are not supported?
>
>
the system is opensuse 11.2, I just simply start the machine boot up,
after nm connects I open a terminal then suspend in the terminal, upon
wakeup this message appears.
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17061
>> Subject : 2.6.36-rc1 on zaurus: bluetooth regression
>> Submitter : Pavel Machek<pavel@ucw.cz>
>> Date : 2010-08-21 15:24 (44 days old)
>> Message-ID :<20100821152445.GA1536@ucw.cz>
>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128240433828087&w=2
>
> I see no updates to this since August. There are boat load of PCMCIA
> changes recently, is bisect possible here?
>
>
yeah the first pcmcia bug I hit with this machine was back in may/june
ended up doing a bisect for that(which was painful due to a slow
machine)which ended up getting fixed.(never thought to check s2ram after
that)
as for bluetooth the only issue I have with that is for my other
machines which is hitting this: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/9/1/61
(but have not had a chance to follow through due to doing the update
broken web addresses in the kernel)
>> Regressions with patches
>> ------------------------
>
>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17722
>> Subject : 2.6.36-rc3: WARNING: at net/mac80211/scan.c:269 ieee80211_scan_completed
>> Submitter : Thomas Meyer<thomas@m3y3r.de>
>> Date : 2010-08-31 20:14 (34 days old)
>> Message-ID :<201008312214.52473.thomas@m3y3r.de>
>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128328580504227&w=2
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg140769.html
>> Handled-By : Florian Mickler<florian@mickler.org>
>> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=31671
>
> This seems fixed.
>
> Luis
>
alright if this is with the latest wireless tree, then I can throw that
in to verify that it is indeed fixed..
Justin P. Mattock
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread