From: Suraj Sumangala <suraj@Atheros.com>
To: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@profusion.mobi>
Cc: Suraj Sumangala <Suraj.Sumangala@Atheros.com>,
"linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
Jothikumar Mothilal <Jothikumar.Mothilal@Atheros.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Bluetooth: process received S-frames when socket is locked by user process
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 22:04:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D49879F.8020000@Atheros.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110202162818.GD2273@joana>
Hi Gustavo,
On 2/2/2011 9:58 PM, Gustavo F. Padovan wrote:
> Hi Suraj,
>
> * Suraj Sumangala<suraj@atheros.com> [2011-01-31 18:42:51 +0530]:
>
>> This patch lets L2CAP process received S-frames even when socket is
>> continuously being locked by user process.
>>
>> This issue was seen when testing with l2test without using "-D" option.
>>
>> Since the user process does not expect any Rx packets,
>> it hogs the socket with continuous call to "send()".
>>
>> When the TxWindow is full Tx stops untill the I-frames are acked by the receiver.
>>
>> But the Rx S-Frame acknowleding the Tx frames will stay in the backlog queue
>> because the "sock_owned_by_user()" call in l2cap_data_channel()
>> will always return true.
>>
>> The user process does not have an idea about this
>> mechanism and keep pumping data and locking the socket and cause a deadlock.
>
> In which kernel are you seeing this error? I think it is already fixed.
>
> Regards,
>
Can you direct me to the patch which fixed it?
I had see this problem when verifying Bluetooth 3.0 in kernel version
2.6.35 and see similar code in the kernel-next tree. That is the reason
why I sent an RFC.
Regards
Suraj
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-02 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-31 13:12 [RFC] Bluetooth: process received S-frames when socket is locked by user process Suraj Sumangala
2011-02-02 16:28 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-02-02 16:34 ` Suraj Sumangala [this message]
2011-02-02 16:51 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-02-02 17:35 ` Suraj Sumangala
2011-02-02 17:41 ` Gustavo F. Padovan
2011-02-03 6:50 ` Suraj Sumangala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D49879F.8020000@Atheros.com \
--to=suraj@atheros.com \
--cc=Jothikumar.Mothilal@Atheros.com \
--cc=Suraj.Sumangala@Atheros.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=padovan@profusion.mobi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).