RE: [Bluez-devel] Patch for bluez-hcidump-1.5

[Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>]

At 8:7 M 2/7/2002 -0800, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:

>i will try to make the first step and create hci.h and l2cap.h
>that will contain only HCI and L2CAP types and defines - no system
>specific code. the next step is to define API for Bluetooth sockets
>(HCI and L2CAP), i.e. ioctl names, setsockopt defines etc. i also
>propose to define common libBluetooth, libHCI (and probably libL2CAP)
>API that will hide possible implementation differences. after we
>do that all application just will use defined API and source code
>will be 100% portable.
libL2CAP ?? We don't have libTCP/IP, do we ?
To much abstraction is _bad_.

>as for RFCOMM, SDP etc. then you guys will lead the parade :)
>i'm currently using BlueZ code with the minimal changes. i'm just
>hoping that SDP, RFCOMM etc. implementation won't become too
>Linux specific :)
SDP should be portable. 
But RFCOMM TTY stuff will probably be different. How are you going to
implement it btw ?

Max