Re: [Bluez-devel] Bluetooth Qualification - plan to make a plan

[Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>]

At 04:47 AM 3/5/2003, Stephen Crane wrote:
>On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 12:04, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
>> > BlueZ seems to be the sole copyright of Qualcomm - is this correct?
>> > 
>> > Would it be appropriate to make the listing in the name of Qualcomm with Max
>> > as the contact, or is there now some other kind of BlueZ organisation?
>> 
>> The copyright thing is not very easy. The core code (HCI and L2CAP) are
>> copyright of Qualcomm, the BNEP code contains copyright from Inventel
>> and Max, the RFCOMM code has copyright from Max and me. The HCI drivers
>> have much more different copyrights inside. For the user space part you
>> will also get some more names.
>> 
>> Maybe my idea with an own organization for BlueZ is a good one.
>
>Or turn the copyright over to the FSF? 
Very very very very (whole bunch of "very" words here) unlikely :)

>(I'd push to have the user-space libs relicensed under the LGPL first though.)
Yeah, thanks for reminder :)

Max