From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: tty: memory corruption through tty_release/tty_ldisc_release
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:47:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5194E380.1030109@hurleysoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <519480A1.6030909@ahsoftware.de>
On 05/16/2013 02:45 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after some pain because the "big step" (ecbbfd4) happened while the support for my AMD CPU was broken and thus git bisect hit a series of kernels which didn't boot, I've finally found the cause for a memory corruption: tty_ldisc_release().
>
> What happens is the following:
>
> tty_port is self-destructing, that means it destroys itself in tty_port.c:tty_port_destructor() when the last reference is gone. E.g. in case of rfcomm this happens with the call to tty->ops->close() in tty_io.c:tty_release().
>
> The problem here is that tty_io.c:tty_release() calls tty_ldisc.c:tty_ldisc_release() which uses the tty_port to flush the ldisc work queues.
>
> In the best case this hits a BUG() in cancel_work_sync() but often it just causes a memory corruption without a BUG() got hit before.
Hi Alexander,
Actually, the problem is that tty->ops->close() shouldn't be
the last kref on the port.
It doesn't look to me like device removal is being handled
properly.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-16 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-16 6:45 BUG: tty: memory corruption through tty_release/tty_ldisc_release Alexander Holler
2013-05-16 13:15 ` Alexander Holler
2013-05-16 13:47 ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2013-05-16 13:59 ` Alexander Holler
2013-05-16 21:53 ` Peter Hurley
2013-05-17 4:43 ` Alexander Holler
2013-06-25 14:18 ` Dean Jenkins
2013-06-26 7:23 ` Alexander Holler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5194E380.1030109@hurleysoftware.com \
--to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=holler@ahsoftware.de \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).