From: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@samsung.com>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Regression fix revert: "Bluetooth: Add missing reset_resume dev_pm_ops"
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 09:05:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524D87A3.9090008@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <508150F6-D142-4406-8CC9-57DDE754F391@holtmann.org>
On 10/02/2013 09:39 PM, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
>
>>> Many btusb devices have 2 modes, a hid mode and a bluetooth hci mode. These
>>> devices default to hid mode for BIOS use. This means that after having been
>>> reset they will revert to HID mode, and are no longer usable as a HCI.
>>>
>>> Therefor it is a very bad idea to just blindly make reset_resume point to
>>> the regular resume handler. Note that the btusb driver has no clue how to
>>> switch these devices from hid to hci mode, this is done in userspace through
>>> udev rules, so the proper way to deal with this is to not have a reset-resume
>>> handler and instead let the usb-system re-enumerate the device, and re-run
>>> the udev rules.
>>>
>>> I must also note, that the commit message for the commit causing this
>>> problem has a very weak motivation for the change:
>>>
>>> "Add missing reset_resume dev_pm_ops. Missing reset_resume results in the
>>> following message after power management device test. This change sets
>>> reset_resume to btusb_resume().
>>>
>>> [ 2506.936134] btusb 1-1.5:1.0: no reset_resume for driver btusb?
>>> [ 2506.936137] btusb 1-1.5:1.1: no reset_resume for driver btusb?"
>>>
>>> Making a change solely to silence a warning while also changing important
>>> behavior (normal resume handling versus re-enumeration) requires a commit
>>> message with a proper explanation why it is safe to do so, which clearly lacks
>>> here, and unsurprisingly it turns out to not be safe to make this change.
>>>
>>> Reverting the commit in question fixes bt no longer working on my Dell
>>> E6430 after a suspend/resume, and I believe it likely also fixes the
>>> following bugs:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988481
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010649
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1213239
>>>
>>> This reverts commit 502f769662978a2fe99d0caed5e53e3006107381.
>>>
>>> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@samsung.com>
>>> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 1 -
>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> Patch has been applied to bluetooth.git. Thanks.
>
> why? Because we have one broken Dell Bluetooth dongle. Do we actually know how this affects other chips. The dell HID Proxy thing has always been special case and that is Dell's fault. Look at the extra code that we have in hid2hci tool and its udev rules for Dell hardware. Is anybody actually willing to investigate this one properly.
>
> Regards
>
> Marcel
>
Sorry for the late reply on this. Sorry for the regression on Dell. I
didn't see any problems when I tested it on the bluetooth mouse I have.
However, I understand what Hans is saying. My change did cause a
regression. I will investigate this further.
The warning message itself is very misleading in the sense that it gives
the impression that the resume routine that should have been installed
is missing. Which is what caused me to fix things in the first place.
thanks,
-- Shuah
--
Shuah Khan
Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group
Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley)
shuah.kh@samsung.com | (970) 672-0658
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-03 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-28 13:25 [PATCH] Regression fix revert: "Bluetooth: Add missing reset_resume dev_pm_ops" Hans de Goede
2013-10-02 19:02 ` Gustavo Padovan
2013-10-03 3:39 ` Marcel Holtmann
2013-10-03 7:00 ` Hans de Goede
2013-10-03 15:05 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2013-10-28 14:54 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524D87A3.9090008@samsung.com \
--to=shuah.kh@samsung.com \
--cc=gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).