linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
	"Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@padovan.org>,
	Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] bluetooth: raise HCI_CMD_TIMEOUT from 2s to 8s
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 08:36:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53897886.3020200@ahsoftware.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B76D7881-8AE8-480D-A53B-B300DDEEBC47@holtmann.org>

Am 31.05.2014 07:32, schrieb Marcel Holtmann:
> Hi Alexander,
> 
>> The reasoning to do this is the following:
>>
>> - If a timeout occurs, the HCI-communication is broken afterwards and the
>>  dongle isn't usable anymore.
>> - If it works after e.g. waiting 4s everyone is still happy but if it
>>  just breaks after only waiting 2s nothing is gained.
>> - Having to wait some more seconds until an error occurs doesn't change
>>  anything.
>>
>> So there is no disadvantage in rasing the timeout but a great advantage
>> in case the dongle needs more than 2s to process an HCI command.
>> E.g. I had sometimes HCI command timeouts at boot (but never after the BT stack
>> was successfull started). I assume the reason might be the USB-probing which
>> happend before through the bootloader, which might have confused the dongle
>> such that it needs a bit more time, but I'm not sure.
>>
>> Together with the patch which limits the timeout only to the actual time the
>> dongle needs to process an HCI command (and doesn't include the time the
>> kernel needs to process the answer to an HCI command), my problems were gone.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
>> ---
>> include/net/bluetooth/hci.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
>> index be150cf..d50fd34 100644
>> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
>> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
>> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ enum {
>> #define HCI_DISCONN_TIMEOUT	msecs_to_jiffies(2000)	/* 2 seconds */
>> #define HCI_PAIRING_TIMEOUT	msecs_to_jiffies(60000)	/* 60 seconds */
>> #define HCI_INIT_TIMEOUT	msecs_to_jiffies(10000)	/* 10 seconds */
>> -#define HCI_CMD_TIMEOUT		msecs_to_jiffies(2000)	/* 2 seconds */
>> +#define HCI_CMD_TIMEOUT		msecs_to_jiffies(8000)	/* 8 seconds */
>> #define HCI_ACL_TX_TIMEOUT	msecs_to_jiffies(45000)	/* 45 seconds */
>> #define HCI_AUTO_OFF_TIMEOUT	msecs_to_jiffies(2000)	/* 2 seconds */
>> #define HCI_POWER_OFF_TIMEOUT	msecs_to_jiffies(5000)	/* 5 seconds */
> 
> I think moving the command timeout handling into a delayed work struct might actually solve this problem nicely and does not force us to increase the timeout. A chip that does not respond for 8 seconds is a pretty bad chip.

As I said in another mail, I don't think it is the chip. On the system
where I'm experiencing these timeouts there's still the USB-subsysten
inbetween. And this system boots from USB too, which means there's a lot
of other traffic on the USB-bus besides the one for the USB-BT-dongle.
And I don't know how the USB-stack (and hw) schedules the traffic, if he
is able to schedule that at all.

Regards,

Alexander

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-31  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-14 14:00 [PATCH 1/2] bluetooth: don't include local processing of HCI commands in the command timeout Alexander Holler
2014-05-14 14:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] bluetooth: raise HCI_CMD_TIMEOUT from 2s to 8s Alexander Holler
2014-05-15 12:54   ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2014-05-15 14:50     ` Alexander Holler
2014-05-15 15:19       ` Alexander Holler
2014-05-16  5:35         ` Alexander Holler
2014-05-27 15:19           ` Alexander Holler
2014-05-31  5:32   ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-05-31  6:36     ` Alexander Holler [this message]
2014-06-01  1:42       ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-05-31  5:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] bluetooth: don't include local processing of HCI commands in the command timeout Marcel Holtmann
2014-05-31  6:45   ` Alexander Holler
2014-05-31  7:09     ` Alexander Holler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53897886.3020200@ahsoftware.de \
    --to=holler@ahsoftware.de \
    --cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
    --cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).