I hope that you are not upset that was not my intention. I am just trying to understand clearly what is possible.<br> Does this mean I should not have migrated from 2.6.18 if I still wanted to use bluez? <br> Can anyone confirm they use later?<br> Thanks for helping.<br> -Walt<br> My wording is because I was not convinced I had not done something wrong. :)<br> <br><br><b><i>Brad Midgley &lt;bmidgley@gmail.com&gt;</i></b> wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;">there is no "stable branch" of the kernel in the same way we had before. the module api changes enough from release to release to make it painful to maintain a module outside the kernel. (and don't ask... it will never be merged upstream because it doesn't belong in the kernel) <br><br> </blockquote><br><p>&#32;

<hr size=1>No need to miss a message. <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=43910/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail
">Get email on-the-go </a><br>with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=43910/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail
">Get started.</a>