From: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@intel.com>
To: Frederic Danis <frederic.danis@intel.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Frederic Danis <frederic.danis@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Add suspend/resume runtime PM functions
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:44:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F2A28D.9010506@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55F19651.8090908@intel.com>
Hi Fred
>> For hci_intel we are doing this in the enqueue function when the
>> Bluetooth subsystem has to send us data. Why would we do this on the
>> TTY receiving side here? If the device is not active, we would not be
>> receiving anything in the first place. I am failing to see the logic
>> here.
> hci_intel also performs this when receiving LPM_OP_TX_NOTIFY packets.
> Afaik, Broadcom device does not have this feature and we need to delay
> the suspend when we receive a packet.
>
> I will move bcm_schedule_work() after h4_recv_buf() to perform it only
> on completed packet.
What about using a delayed work with work_delay << autosuspend_delay so
that the work is not queued each time but every work_delay in worst case.
hci_uart proto callback is called with rx spinlock in
hci_uart_tty_receive which is the receive_buf ldisc callback.
In drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c we can see that flush_to_ldisc (work) locks
a mutex (&buf->lock) and push the data to ldisc via receive_buf.
So, I don't see any problem to remove the hci_ldisc rx_spinlock and
replace it by a mutex, or even don't use locking at all.
Regards,
Loic
--
Intel Open Source Technology Center
http://oss.intel.com/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-11 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-09 7:54 [PATCH v3 0/3] Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Add wake-up and PM runtime support Frederic Danis
2015-09-09 7:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Fix IRQ polarity for T100 Frederic Danis
2015-09-09 16:13 ` Marcel Holtmann
2015-09-10 9:33 ` Frederic Danis
2015-09-09 7:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Prepare PM runtime support Frederic Danis
2015-09-09 16:18 ` Marcel Holtmann
2015-09-10 9:35 ` Frederic Danis
2015-09-09 7:54 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Add suspend/resume runtime PM functions Frederic Danis
2015-09-09 16:29 ` Marcel Holtmann
2015-09-10 14:40 ` Frederic Danis
2015-09-11 9:44 ` Loic Poulain [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F2A28D.9010506@intel.com \
--to=loic.poulain@intel.com \
--cc=frederic.danis@intel.com \
--cc=frederic.danis@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).