From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
"Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@padovan.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Cleanup the device probe code
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 09:26:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560CD230.9050008@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9BB7E6C8-A45E-4D88-8B01-D1660370B7FF@holtmann.org>
On 09/30/2015 05:52 PM, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Jarkko,
>
>> There is some unneeded code in "hci_intel" probing. First
>> acpi_match_device() call is needless as driver/platform/acpi core code has
>> already done the matching before calling the probe and the driver does not
>> use the returned pointer to matching _HID other than checking is it NULL.
>>
>> Then tree wide grep for "hci_intel" doesn't reveal that there is any code
>> registering this platform device so it looks this device is always backed
>> with ACPI companion so also ACPI_HANDLE() test can be removed.
>
> eventually there will be DT platform device. Does that make a difference or is it still valid to remove this probe handling.
>
Also with DT matching the acpi_match_device() is needless. Adding DT
support here means just adding pointer to OF match table like below and
core will call the probe if there is a match to "hci_intel" platform
device, ACPI _HID or OF node.
static struct platform_driver intel_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "hci_intel",
.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(intel_acpi_match),
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(intel_of_match),
},
};
If there is need to differentiate between these in probe the driver
could do for instance
if (has_acpi_companion(&pdev->dev)) {
/* ACPI enumerated */
} else if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
/* DT enumerated */
} else {
/* platform device */
}
--
Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-01 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-30 13:28 [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Cleanup the device probe code Jarkko Nikula
2015-09-30 14:52 ` Marcel Holtmann
2015-10-01 6:26 ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
2015-10-01 6:57 ` Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560CD230.9050008@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@intel.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).