Anyone? Anyone?
Attached is an updated patch with the changes that we talked about.
ChrisOn Dec 3, 2007 11:59 AM, Marcel Holtmann < marcel@holtmann.org> wrote:Hi Chris,I am okay with that. Please abstract everything into common/. And don't
>
> I meant to look into it, but never got around it. Some small
> comments
> about it. Don't make the applet a singleton. That is totally
> unneeded
> since the applet will be loaded at login.
>
> I still think it should be a singleton. You wouldn't ever want two
> applets running unless you're testing, and we have the singleton flags
> for that. I don't think this hurts anything.
forget to document it in the manual pages.In a simple way you can use GObject for it. It is better than using the
> For the "Present" method. Don't use the D-Bus low-level calls.
> It should
> be all dbus-glib. Which means we have to abstract that into an
> object. I
> don't know if there is a well defined way for this. If it is,
> it might
> be good to use that. If not, then propose something for
> freedesktop.org.
>
> I thought about doing this, but it seems like overkill to define a
> GObject to just expose one method. GObject isn't exactly terse
> either.
low-level D-Bus calls.Mainly the spacing.
> And we should probably have some generic methods inside
> common/ instead
> of doing it again in every program.
>
> Please follow the kernel coding style. I know it is odd for a
> GTK
> application, but it makes it a lot easier for me.
>
> Which parts of the patch violate the kernel coding style? The
> function parameter spacing?