From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53313C433F5 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 14:10:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242779AbiCBOKw (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 09:10:52 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54378 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242769AbiCBOKu (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 09:10:50 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80B89C2481 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 06:09:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qv1-xf2a.google.com with SMTP id f4so1178694qvd.0 for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 06:09:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:from:to:subject:reply-to:in-reply-to :references; bh=zrUawacDijnh4O5vC6iZGfb6nFIfCw8xS6BZUXH3lyg=; b=TIf2Gbxtpz37yk66NfJi6yuKHr6BBzFPYtOxepSa0eDFhoSw1EwE8+Dud1d3OBFlHG gj/Kg/xvC75o4lu6adT8v4nHUf9hqlGboU6z26cPC6figB26zjRrzMbiud2mwOGQPWnH QO0utzsBM2wrTN3OYdsrN8fpjvW7KU2532ru0ibPk+MKdMT9INin57bzAQcxVQiWnLQA pWD+SA18rieKZKY2HKRDv/4cnsMpTR3r1DQKyyIBgbvwl70UpwLFfFZ/63kW4Iu91t1P qOFF1sbjfzbIABxaR0GeZ7rjAmnu1MV35DvucCTJKBf2dsn8iSroYOBOp491MMm4hawQ 61CA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:from:to:subject :reply-to:in-reply-to:references; bh=zrUawacDijnh4O5vC6iZGfb6nFIfCw8xS6BZUXH3lyg=; b=iDs47uXZqlZQB1V5k/km9JQYYurJiK8AX8rwnkq/np3RBllnqxoNZTtITjfAQUn6ER Wn674taoTMjcqHbAnmSyJ/3cM3PP906D0PT3eqBPrt7UURxcjWLAs9vdT8fygnfDX/aW IsBrq/7y4hqDV7QqWPrnAJ2USr1lPULXYVVpkXzaVPie4xDoUyJTqfNdUyQEmDQXPyvy MsWni5XgKpxMWxjs5cFXILVBUIdI85VccKRY0Uzk3Snmt+WL8OrJzG0bCGHE09iWGu5H PuxgqJV32qi53JEshcSA9+00XGeFAa9ThghrfCcTw5h9NnOFdcqyQ/skd0/Jm6gCYOD8 aucw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531wsCw8CoEYhdNb1Xh1V4him9sH25z0OpHkL9owDumAT+iADzrD C2+U6tk198KJa3cWjN+iK6bd1+sJKvo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwjt8Tkv8kb9rge556vZAY3mlL+j+DcPBT5kIB4t95DgbwfNmlxmfwyVMwkATZ7hy78Ve1i8w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:27e4:b0:42e:a257:b77c with SMTP id jt4-20020a05621427e400b0042ea257b77cmr21042103qvb.62.1646230190289; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 06:09:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.17.0.2] ([13.82.126.25]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s19-20020ac85cd3000000b002de4e165ae0sm11290349qta.75.2022.03.02.06.09.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 02 Mar 2022 06:09:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <621f7aae.1c69fb81.1e0a4.91fc@mx.google.com> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 06:09:50 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4429384641586876618==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: bluez.test.bot@gmail.com To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, hdegoede@redhat.com Subject: RE: Bluetooth: hci_core: Fix unbalanced unlock in set_device_flags() Reply-To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20220302134439.515377-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> References: <20220302134439.515377-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org --===============4429384641586876618== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! Dear submitter, Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series: PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=619579 ---Test result--- Test Summary: CheckPatch PASS 1.68 seconds GitLint PASS 0.97 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 0.85 seconds BuildKernel PASS 36.20 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 31.72 seconds Incremental Build with patchesPASS 43.70 seconds TestRunner: Setup PASS 564.00 seconds TestRunner: l2cap-tester PASS 15.37 seconds TestRunner: bnep-tester PASS 7.22 seconds TestRunner: mgmt-tester PASS 117.53 seconds TestRunner: rfcomm-tester FAIL 9.09 seconds TestRunner: sco-tester PASS 8.99 seconds TestRunner: smp-tester PASS 8.92 seconds TestRunner: userchan-tester PASS 7.47 seconds Details ############################## Test: TestRunner: rfcomm-tester - FAIL - 9.09 seconds Run test-runner with rfcomm-tester Total: 10, Passed: 9 (90.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases Basic RFCOMM Socket Client - Write 32k Success Failed 0.188 seconds --- Regards, Linux Bluetooth --===============4429384641586876618==--