From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A22DC433EF for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 02:38:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231877AbiCCCjI (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 21:39:08 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54528 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231875AbiCCCjH (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 21:39:07 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-x129.google.com (mail-il1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::129]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7120D74 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 18:38:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-x129.google.com with SMTP id i14so2968167ilv.4 for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 18:38:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:from:to:subject:reply-to:in-reply-to :references; bh=tbtI9/vicxIW4T5k8zQZdslCGqL4uxN66M46uOAKQqM=; b=hxqt8jMa9Fv/jC3HAwHBmSHCHEnkXcofaUIzwK5GLK5LyoUD5QJ54X+dU31EYKpvDy tOoZl4ZKJBgygwHf4TwNfnaulzkdgJFKgUhhaR0JjP2xBELf7WhCtbRm6ukQVXo+Ic/1 /fL7VHhjGsc/c0rQih9Hw3V2ovUDjSyEwcIS647LGJlcBMQF/J2N0LX1HwVjvN2ipyiT p2j6gG5LcI23rLnxmF6cxQUHbi7ny6uyWu3AMeipK03SINODaKdmgPq1X5obytfb+SHF 5UhWHMW3fIcFi6YfnD5tJUv1epPBRtMHcxNlojWHU4YHsMeGjh6miKSp9BjoxXsDhw3m QR5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:from:to:subject :reply-to:in-reply-to:references; bh=tbtI9/vicxIW4T5k8zQZdslCGqL4uxN66M46uOAKQqM=; b=Aa2WfGQEymWly8WbjdR4Xb1YoWc/oxvv7kjlKHx54zzxLfNNEu0LlpaKlIhKGCkyqk XckLQJ5ZLtqnY6WDtBW+zcP7tCOaqHKYNP4GvyQapXRNJa2bAPOG5hFQOeNA58sg2wpr bqIqIPDc7g3P8vffV/PAGUPoDzDzeayavlbrtS+VqZGD3FBajl8FDxK1es1etBLREaOa fzgYEXLd98+35Ik8/BU+u+PoE+EEX0dpmxmOBBjj2ZXrk4tCcrVmiu5IhkDuOgWBcxsT mu9ZTi67d4AR3EgNRZiPixEqWCvF5g1ZNqviEoovvX93l1TUlNYOOdEtLmVMcAps+//A dHcg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532jHkMv8OzXRfvnw3uYzpXFd7jVtJtyc8XUelwim5/uT7MRO5hN 5sD9202ICg8sOVVMCKK+Dn72+GdApR8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzemq1Dc+wICptWo+SIOju/3rdIBay7Yy9hop6x1fkSnxlGV9iJdYoa2J7qfDUkNfDwyl2sYA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1c8b:b0:2b8:ba1d:859b with SMTP id w11-20020a056e021c8b00b002b8ba1d859bmr31332238ill.233.1646275102913; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 18:38:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.17.0.2] ([40.69.153.201]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k4-20020a5e9304000000b00640dfe71dc8sm449985iom.46.2022.03.02.18.38.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 02 Mar 2022 18:38:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <62202a1e.1c69fb81.a6f0c.20a0@mx.google.com> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 18:38:22 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0050027324030908742==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: bluez.test.bot@gmail.com To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, luiz.dentz@gmail.com Subject: RE: Bluetooth: Fix not checking for valid hdev on bt_dev_{info,warn,err,dbg} Reply-To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20220302230858.444141-1-luiz.dentz@gmail.com> References: <20220302230858.444141-1-luiz.dentz@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org --===============0050027324030908742== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! Dear submitter, Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series: PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=619731 ---Test result--- Test Summary: CheckPatch PASS 1.17 seconds GitLint PASS 0.70 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 0.66 seconds BuildKernel PASS 34.09 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 29.89 seconds Incremental Build with patchesPASS 39.38 seconds TestRunner: Setup PASS 581.60 seconds TestRunner: l2cap-tester PASS 11.15 seconds TestRunner: bnep-tester PASS 4.70 seconds TestRunner: mgmt-tester PASS 91.13 seconds TestRunner: rfcomm-tester FAIL 5.91 seconds TestRunner: sco-tester PASS 5.97 seconds TestRunner: smp-tester PASS 5.89 seconds TestRunner: userchan-tester PASS 4.85 seconds Details ############################## Test: TestRunner: rfcomm-tester - FAIL - 5.91 seconds Run test-runner with rfcomm-tester Total: 10, Passed: 9 (90.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases Basic RFCOMM Socket Client - Write 32k Success Failed 0.125 seconds --- Regards, Linux Bluetooth --===============0050027324030908742==--