From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A350AC433F5 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 22:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233243AbiCCWtS (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2022 17:49:18 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43286 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231754AbiCCWtR (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2022 17:49:17 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x72f.google.com (mail-qk1-x72f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E1B7652C7 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 14:48:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk1-x72f.google.com with SMTP id n185so5156060qke.5 for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2022 14:48:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:from:to:subject:reply-to:in-reply-to :references; bh=6S6SsOwQ1dNz9Us/GiKbsUfcGmIcrDMe0zTpbwqU9MA=; b=XqNo8tp83YedbK5CGFRlikhNzmF4+zksQ0EnPUcFWwT+oTP17OOaRZDBZZWR9NT8Rt BXd5A1sJVyexPtikLQ6KslI3e5HGEnqtcytLQCBdHqld3grIXS//AxeiGDDgnFZY/Mto u2CUbxmKdZRRBQtjrmtCIAlD9bIOr7CxPbrHjUdpNFXtftPyoav5o0FZoJ3sHt22h7Rg Cqt7DeqjO5LNoHZc/j+lsjtpPGFwOCDMtTo8gSWnYiynL2X2UfyCB0lMGlCzU9h1DPis pMJqV9kmE7cpI199zfvO5bJk62+pkfDW4kiRxMuoXTRHt1aCtsDIskIgIEP7X/tDtcis aTCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:from:to:subject :reply-to:in-reply-to:references; bh=6S6SsOwQ1dNz9Us/GiKbsUfcGmIcrDMe0zTpbwqU9MA=; b=P/gI0B8nPtPhyix4JMUOSCrO3Ib1Mhj731kqYIBTlElrRY1UThVXELMnvUVyi4/SIN nAFTDdzIBJuOTyvBMDsamlhlYmRmmA7gBgQjE/u/Jk2JmRGjioZdfQdGwgnfOwh9zLrw KVvSt8ndH8qGx809E5si3KXqu1MJNDpGgsmr9dWYdZzo+2QiAzFa4Al8+f/v6Ae4+ma6 wZ/XNLpuCBQIqWaEaUtYhM3PhM0SXACVFP9G19PljRwdK1XwGU4OVsfxrKmpOE5IUlmU drpN0mR7UUB57B/BY5t00wl79t52Mt5yQRrOR8J7mOElBpKtPkLlLRQaKQiA68UzPBwL lhaA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531WWm63cfjduIr+VP4CkbqqqRa3CZzY9l+TAGyQ/6JdioYHR5BG O8afbS08FnX0M9zM35FbpQm7pMHWYeg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJynYOD1yZFf+OJy0DFslfV3TiN1sKLwepEqjwjSksJoq7Zr4qXVW8FlQObPBkcSnmnU8okZrQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:a82:b0:508:b41b:c44b with SMTP id v2-20020a05620a0a8200b00508b41bc44bmr941277qkg.100.1646347710242; Thu, 03 Mar 2022 14:48:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.17.0.2] ([20.114.226.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c7-20020ac85a87000000b002dff4c183ecsm2435004qtc.29.2022.03.03.14.48.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 03 Mar 2022 14:48:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <622145be.1c69fb81.32a86.e294@mx.google.com> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2022 14:48:30 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1952141483379228124==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: bluez.test.bot@gmail.com To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, luiz.dentz@gmail.com Subject: RE: [v2] Bluetooth: Fix not checking for valid hdev on bt_dev_{info,warn,err,dbg} Reply-To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20220303211157.334337-1-luiz.dentz@gmail.com> References: <20220303211157.334337-1-luiz.dentz@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org --===============1952141483379228124== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! Dear submitter, Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series: PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=620122 ---Test result--- Test Summary: CheckPatch PASS 1.64 seconds GitLint PASS 1.02 seconds SubjectPrefix PASS 0.90 seconds BuildKernel PASS 38.27 seconds BuildKernel32 PASS 33.54 seconds Incremental Build with patchesPASS 45.38 seconds TestRunner: Setup PASS 584.82 seconds TestRunner: l2cap-tester PASS 16.89 seconds TestRunner: bnep-tester PASS 7.49 seconds TestRunner: mgmt-tester PASS 124.54 seconds TestRunner: rfcomm-tester FAIL 9.73 seconds TestRunner: sco-tester PASS 9.52 seconds TestRunner: smp-tester PASS 9.56 seconds TestRunner: userchan-tester PASS 7.99 seconds Details ############################## Test: TestRunner: rfcomm-tester - FAIL - 9.73 seconds Run test-runner with rfcomm-tester Total: 10, Passed: 9 (90.0%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0 Failed Test Cases Basic RFCOMM Socket Client - Write 32k Success Failed 0.196 seconds --- Regards, Linux Bluetooth --===============1952141483379228124==--